期刊文献+

Mast Quadrant微创系统不同入路治疗退变性腰椎疾病近期疗效分析 被引量:3

Short-term effectiveness of Mast Quadrant retractor in treatment of degenerative lumbar disease by different accesses
原文传递
导出
摘要 [目的]分析采用Quadrant微创系统经肌间隙入路和经肌肉入路治疗退变性腰椎疾病的临床疗效。[方法]2009年9月~2012年3月,对26例腰椎退变性疾病患者采用Quadrant微创系统进行腰椎减压融合内固定手术。随机选择经肌间隙和经肌肉至目标部位两种入路,比较两组患者的围手术期参数(手术时间、出血量、暴露入路时切除的软组织量、住院时间、并发症发生情况)和临床随访时的疗效(腰腿痛VAS、ODI评分)。[结果]所有患者均顺利完成手术,并完成半年以上的临床随访,无术中及术后并发症发生。在围手术期参数比较中,采用经肌肉入路暴露过程中切除的软组织量少于经肌间隙入路(P<0.05),其他参数比较无显著性差异(P>0.05)。在临床随访中,与术前比较两组均有效缓解临床症状(P<0.05),但在两组之间比较差异性不大(P>0.05),两种入路均能有效进行减压固定操作。[结论]采用Quadrant微创系统不同入路治疗退变性腰椎疾病均能有效减压、重建脊柱稳定性,两种术式在临床疗效上差异性不大,但是经肌肉入路手术治疗暴露后肌肉组织张力明显减小、操作空间较大,更适于复杂操作的完成。 [Objective]To investigate the short-term clinical curative effects of the Mast Quadrant minimally invasive system in the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases by thoracolumbar vertebra-side muscle clearance approach and by muscle approach.[Methods]Twenty-six patients with degenerative lumbar diseases were divided into thoracolumbar vertebra-side muscle clearance approach group and muscle approach group from September 2009 to March 2012.The perioperative parameters(the operation time,intraoperatve blood soss,the quality of the soft tissue of the resection and hospitalization time) and the follow-up clinical curative effect(lumbocrural pain VAS and ODI) were compared.[Results]All surgery were successfully completed and got more than 6 months follow-up.The quality of the soft tissue of the resection of muscle approach group was better than that of thoracolumbar vertebra-side muscle clearance approach group(P&lt;0.05).Other perioperative parameters had no significant differences(P&gt;0.05).And two groups obtained approximate clinical curative effect with conventional surgery(P&gt;0.05).[Conclusion]The Quadrant minimally invasive system in the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases by different accesses both can decompress effectively and rebuild spinal stability.And there is no difference in clinical curative effect.But muscle approach group decreased muscle tension obviously and gained greater operating space,which is more suitable for complex surgery.
出处 《中国矫形外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第17期1720-1724,共5页 Orthopedic Journal of China
关键词 Quadrant微创系统 腰椎退变 微创手术 手术入路 临床疗效 Quadrant minimally invasive system degenerative lumbar diseases minimally invasive surgery surgery approach clinical curative effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献28

  • 1孙常太,张启伟,申剑,张文化.经X-tube微创腰椎椎弓根螺钉内固定椎间融合术手术体会[J].脊柱外科杂志,2004,2(3):185-186. 被引量:9
  • 2钱列,贾连顺,陈雄生,邵将,严望军,曹师峰.腰椎间盘突出症术后下腰痛及再突出的临床分析[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2006,14(5):337-339. 被引量:22
  • 3Lee DY, Shim CS, Ahn Y, et al. Comparison of percutaneous endo- scopic lumbar discectomy and open lumbar microdiscectomy for re- current disc herniation. J Korean Neurosurg Soc, 2009, 46(6): 515-521. 被引量:1
  • 4Chen Z, Zhao J, Liu A, et al. Surgical treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation by transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Int Or- thop, 2009, 33(1): 197-201. 被引量:1
  • 5Kaner T, Sasani M, Oktenoglu T, et al. Minimum two-year follow-up of cases with recurrent disc herniation treated with microdiscectomy and posterior dynamic transpedicular stabilisation. Open Orthop J, 2010, 24(4): 120-125. 被引量:1
  • 6Lee SH, Kang BU, Jeon SH, et al. Revision surgery of the lumbar spine: anterior lumbar interbody fusion followed by percutaneous pedicle screw fixation. J Neurosurg Spine, 2006, 5(3): 228-233. 被引量:1
  • 7Choi JY, Choi YW, Sung KH. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion in pa- tients with a previous discectomy: minimum 2-year follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2005, 18(4): 347-352. 被引量:1
  • 8Vishteh AG, Dickman CA. Anterior lumbar microdiscectomy and interbody fusion for the treatment of recurrent disc herniation. Neuro- surgery, 2001, 48(2): 334-337. 被引量:1
  • 9Sairyo K, Sakai T, Yasui N. Minimally invasive technique for direct repair of pars interarticularis defects in adults using a percutaneous pedicle screw and hook-rod system. 1 Neurosurg Spine, 2009, 10(5): 492-495. 被引量:1
  • 10Musacchio M, Patel N, Bagan B, et al. Minimally invasive thoracolum- bar costotransversectomy and corpectomy via a dual-tube technique: evaluation in a cadaver model. Surg Neurol, 2007, 67(4): 348-352. 被引量:1

共引文献80

同被引文献44

  • 1Thomsen K, Christensen FB, Eiskjaer SP, et al. Volvo Award winner in clinical studies. The effects of pedicle screw instrumentation on functional outcome and fusion rates in posterolateral lumbar spinal fu- sion: a prospective, randomized, clinical study [ J]. Spine, 1997, 24:2813 - 2822. 被引量:1
  • 2Prolo D J, Oklund SA, Butcher M. Toward uniformity in evaluating results of lumbar spine operations: a paradigm applied to posterior lumbar interbody fusions [ J]. Spine, 1986,6:601 - 606. 被引量:1
  • 3Park Y, Ha JW. Comparison of one - level posterior lumbar interbody fusion performed with a minimally invasive approach or a traditional open approach [J]. Spine, 2007,5:537 -543. 被引量:1
  • 4Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Tsuji H. Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery: a histologic and enzymatic analysis [ J ]. Spine, 1996,8:941 - 944. 被引量:1
  • 5Gejo R, Matsui H, Kawaguchi Y,et al. Spinal changes in trunk mus- cle performance after posterior lumbar surgery [ J]. Spine, 1999,10 : 1023 - 1028. 被引量:1
  • 6Thomsen K, Christensen FB, Eiskjaer SP, et al. Volvo Award winner in clinical studies. The effects of pedicle screw instrumentation on functional outcome and fusion rates in posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion: a prospec-tive, randomized, clinical study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997; 22(24):2813-2822. 被引量:1
  • 7Guiot BH, Khoo LT, Fessler RG. A minimally invasive technique for decompression of the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2002;27(4):432-438. 被引量:1
  • 8Park Y, Ha JW. Comparison of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion performed with a minimally invasive approach or a traditional open approach. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007; 32(5):537-543. 被引量:1
  • 9Park Y, Ha JW. Comparison of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion performed with a minimally invasive approach or a traditional open approach. Spine. 2007; 32(5) 537-543. 被引量:1
  • 10Pulido-Rivas P, Sola RG, Pallares-Fern~ndez JM, et al. Lumbar spinal surgery in elderly patients. Rev Neurol. 2004; 39(6):501-507. 被引量:1

引证文献3

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部