期刊文献+

3.0TMR扩散加权成像与表观扩散系数诊断前列腺癌的比较 被引量:16

Comparison of 3.0T MR Diffusion Weighted Imaging andApparent DiffusionCoefficient in Diagnosis of Prostatic Carcinoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨3.0TMR扩散加权成像(DWI)及表观扩散系数(ADC)对前列腺癌的诊断价值。资料与方法经超声引导穿刺或病理证实的88例前列腺癌及20例良性前列腺增生(BPH)患者于术前行3.0TMRDWI检查,b值取0、100、800s/mm2。所有患者取癌灶、BPH结节、正常前列腺周围带(PZ),并比较其ADC值,计算前列腺癌在DWI(b=800s/mm2)的阳性显示率。采用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC曲线)及配对χ2检验比较ADC值及DWI(b=800s/mm2)对前列腺癌的诊断效能。结果三种组织间ADC值存在重叠但差异显著(F=937.734,P<0.001),DWI(b=800s/mm2)的前列腺癌阳性检出率为82.4%。ROC曲线分析显示,当ADC值为1.23×10-3mm2/s时,曲线下面积为0.999,诊断前列腺癌的敏感度及特异度均为99.2%;当b=800s/mm2时对前列腺癌的检出率为82.4%(98/119),曲线下面积为0.912,两种方法对前列腺癌的诊断效能差异有统计学意义(F=937.734,P<0.001)。结论 ADC值及DWI对前列腺良恶性组织的鉴别有较大价值,且ADC值优于DWI。 Purpose To evaluate the value of 3.0T MR diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in the diagnosis of prostatic carcinoma. Materials and Methods Eighty-eight patients with prostatic carcinoma and 20 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) who were diagnosed pathologically by surgical or ultrasound guided puncture biopsy underwent 3.0T MR DW1 before operation (b=0, 100, 800 s/ram2). The ADC values of prostate carcinoma or BPH nodules, and peripheral zone (PZ) of all patients were measured and the positive rate of prostate carcinoma in DW1 (b=800 s/mm:) was also calculated. The diagnostic effect of ADC value and DWI (b-800 s/mm-) was compared using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve) and paired y- test. Results The ADC values of the three kinds of tissue were overlapping but the difference was significant (F=937.734, P〈0.001); the positive rate of prostate carcinoma in DWI (b=800 s/mm2) was 82.4%. The ROC curve demonstrated significant diagnostic effect of both ADC value and DWI (b=800 s/mm2) in prostate carcinoma (area under the curve: 0.999 and 0.912, respectively), with a significant difference (F=937.734, P〈0.001 ). Conclusion Both ADC value and DWI have great value in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant prostatic tissue, while the former is better.
出处 《中国医学影像学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2013年第8期602-605,610,共5页 Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging
基金 上海市卫生局资助项目(2010041)
关键词 前列腺肿瘤 磁共振成像 扩散加权成像 表观扩散系数 Prostatic neoplasms Magnetic resonance imaging Diffusion-weighted imaging Apparent diffusion coefficient
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献19

共引文献55

同被引文献140

  • 1黄国鑫,孙黎明,朱进,张景中,杨忠,徐坚民.3D-H^1磁共振波谱及表观扩散系数在老年前列腺良恶性病变中的价值[J].中国老年学杂志,2014,34(3):652-654. 被引量:2
  • 2彭涛,伍兵,肖建明.磁共振波谱与扩散加权成像技术诊断前列腺癌的比较研究[J].四川大学学报(医学版),2013,44(5):827-831. 被引量:6
  • 3崔炳强.全身骨显像评价前列腺癌骨转移特点及其临床应用价值[J].中国临床医学影像杂志,2010,21(11):817-818. 被引量:5
  • 4T Durmus,A Baur,B Hamm.Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of prostate cancer[J].Aktuelle Urologie,2014,2(45):119-126. 被引量:1
  • 5Erik Rud,Eduard Baco,Diep Lien,et al.Detection of radiorecurrent prostate cancer using diffusion-weighted imaging and targeted biopsies[J]AJR.American journal of roentgenology,2014,3(202):w241-246. 被引量:1
  • 6Tobias Penzkofer,Clare M Tempany-Afdhal.Prostate cancer detection and diagnosis:the role of MR and its comparison with other diagnostic modalities--a radiologist's perspective[J].NMR in biomedicine,2014,1(27):3-15. 被引量:1
  • 7Sadhna V, Arumugamn R, Hmnberto M, et al. Assessment of ag- gressiveness of prostate cancer: correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient with histologic grade after radical prostatectomy [ J ]. AJR. 2011, 196( 1 ) : 374-381. 被引量:1
  • 8Torre LA,Bray F,Siegel RL,et al.Global cancer statistics,2012.CA Cancer J Clin,2015,65(2):87-108. 被引量:1
  • 9De Cobelli F,Ravelli S,Esposito A,et al.Apparent diffusion coefficient value and ratio as noninvasive potential biomarkers to predict prostate cancer grading:comparison with prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen.Am J Roentgenol,2015,204(3):550-557. 被引量:1
  • 10Le JD,Tan N,Shkolyar E,et al.Multifocality and prostate cancer detection by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging:correlation with whole-mount histopathology.Eur Urol,2015,67(3):569-576. 被引量:1

引证文献16

二级引证文献135

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部