期刊文献+

“一业一会”还是“一业多会”?——基于行业协会集体物品供给的比较研究 被引量:10

″One Industry,One Association″ or ″One Industry,Many Associations″? A Comparative Study from the Perspective of Provision of Collective Goods by Industrial Associations
下载PDF
导出
摘要 "一业一会"制度与行业协会最优规模的联合约束限制了行业协会数量以及协会内可以容纳的会员数,从而影响集体物品的供给与消费。但是,取消"一业一会"制度可能引发行业协会运行逻辑的转变,进而导致行业协会最优规模缩小以及选择性供给行业性集体物品,从而加剧行业利益代表的碎片化,弱化行业自律,影响行业协会追求行业整体利益的能力。因此,在取消"一业一会"制度时,应基于行业协会运行逻辑的转变,建构行业协会体系与内部均衡机制,防范行业协会集体物品供给出现异化。 Industrial associations across China are bound by the policy of ″one industry,one association.″ The administrative regulation prescribes that additional industrial associations with same or similar business scope as the existing one are not allowed to be established in the same administrative district.Taking into consideration the differences between industrial associations and other ordinary groups or clubs,we propose a model of the relation between the size of an industrial association and its performance in providing collective goods,and it indicates that the latter is constrained by the former.Empirical data confirm that this theoretical conclusion derives from the model.So,the principle of ″one industry,one association″ limits the number of industrial associations in a certain industry,and the optimal size of an industrial association limits the number of members that can be enrolled in an industrial association.Because of these two constraints,some enterprises in the industry that contain a large number of potential members cannot join the current association without affecting its performance,neither can they set up a new association to supply collective goods for themselves,thereby affecting the supply and consumption of collective goods in the industry. However,the removal of the principle of ″one industry,one association″ will cause industrial associations to operate as clubs and fall into the strong control of their members.In the context of ″one industry,many associations,″ associations are likely to be free riders on providing collective goods which benefit the whole industry.Correspondingly,industrial associations will transform themselves into clubs from original industrial organizations representing the interests of the whole industry.The more associations act as clubs,the more excessive attention will be paid to the internal interests of the associations rather than to the whole industry.Accordingly,interest representation by industrial associations will be fragmented.In addition,t
作者 郁建兴 何宾
出处 《浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第3期5-20,共16页 Journal of Zhejiang University:Humanities and Social Sciences
基金 浙江省杰出青年科学基金项目(R6100372)
关键词 行业协会 组织规模 制度比较 集体物品供给 industrial association size of organization comparative study of administrative systems provision of collective goods
  • 相关文献

参考文献29

  • 1江华.民间商会的“一业多会”问题及其求解路径——基于温州行业协会的实证研究[J].中国工业经济,2008(5):25-35. 被引量:18
  • 2G.Deng & S.Kennedy," Big Business and Industry Association Lobbying in China:The Paradox of Contrasting Styles," China Journal,No.63(2010),pp.101-125. 被引量:1
  • 3M.Olson,The Logic of Collective Action:Public Goods and the Theory of Groups,Cambridge:Harvard University Press,1971. 被引量:1
  • 4E.Ostrom,"A Behavioral Approach to the Rational Choice Theory of Collective Action," American Political Science Review,Vol.92,No.1(1998),pp.1-22. 被引量:1
  • 5J.P.Carpenter,"Punishing Free-Riders:How Group Size Affects Mutual Monitoring and the Provision of Public Goods," Games and Economic Behavior,Vol.60,No.1 (2007),pp.31-51. 被引量:1
  • 6J.M.Buchanan & G.Tullock,The Calculus of Consent:Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy,Ann Arbor:The University of Michigan Press,1962. 被引量:1
  • 7O.Bandiera,I.Barankay & I.Rasul,"Cooperation in Collective Action," Economics of Transition,Vol.13,No.3(2005),pp.473-498. 被引量:1
  • 8A.P.Hare,"A Study of Interaction and Consensus in Different Sized Groups," American Sociological Review,Vol.17,No.3(1952),pp.261-267. 被引量:1
  • 9J.James,"A Preliminary Study of the Size Determinant in Small Group Interaction," American Sociological Review,Vol.16,No.4(1951),pp.474-477. 被引量:1
  • 10J.Esteban & D.Ray,"Collective Action and the Group Size Paradox," American Political Science Review,Vol.95,No.3(2001),pp.663-672. 被引量:1

二级参考文献26

同被引文献167

二级引证文献107

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部