期刊文献+

后腹腔镜与开放性肾癌根治术治疗局限性肾癌的疗效比较与选择 被引量:22

Curative effect comparison and choice on localized renal cancer radical treatment by laparoscopic and open surgery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨后腹腔镜与开放性肾癌根治术治疗局限性肾癌的疗效比较与选择。方法收集2011年1月至2013年1月收治的早期局限性肾癌患者86例,采用前瞻性研究方法,分为观察组和对照组,观察组(43例)采用后腹腔镜肾癌根治性切除术,对照组(43例)采用开放性肾癌根治性切除术,对两组患者围手术期相关指标及术后并发症的发生率进行比较。结果观察组和对照组围手术期手术时间、手术出血量、肠功能恢复时间、术后下床时间、住院天数、住院费用及术后3 d相关实验室检查指标进行比较,除肾功能外,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组术后并发症的总的发生率为9.30%(4/43),对照组为25.58%(11/43),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论后腹腔镜肾癌根治术治疗局限性肾癌具有微创、安全、并发症少、对机体炎性反应轻等特点,是今后发展的方向。 Objective To explore curative effect comparison and choice on localized renal cancer radical treatment by Laparoscopic and open surgery.Methods Eighty six patients with localized renal cancer were collected from January 2011 to January 2013.The prospective analysis method was used in this study.All these patients were divided into observation group and control group.The observation group included 43 cases,who received laparoscopic kidney cancer after radical resection.The control group included 43 cases,who received open radical resection of renal cell carcinoma.Related indicators of perioperative patients and the incidence of postoperative complications were compared and analyzed.Results The operation time,surgical perioperative blood loss,bowel function recovery time,postoperative bed time,postoperative hospitalization days,hospitalization expenses and related laboratory examination indexes of observation group and control group were compared and analyzed for total three days.In addition to the renal function,the difference of other indexes was statistically significant(P〈0.05).The incidence of postoperative complications of experimental group was 9.30%(4 /43),while that of the control group was 25.58%(11 /43).The difference of the group was statistically significant(P〈0.05).Conclusion Radical laparoscopic treatment of local kidney cancer is minimally invasive,safe,with less complications and no obvious body inflammatory response,and so on.This method would have good development in the future.
出处 《临床和实验医学杂志》 2013年第13期1024-1025,1027,共3页 Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine
基金 广东省中医药局科研课题(项目编号:20112031) 项目名称:大蒜素诱导肾细胞癌ketr-3细胞凋亡机制的实验研究
关键词 局限性肾癌 后腹腔镜 肾癌根治术 Limitations of kidney cancer After laparoscopic Kidney cancer radical
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献50

共引文献63

同被引文献124

  • 1陈洪波,江克华,胡晓晖,朱圣亮,向小龙.后腹腔镜下肾癌根治术与开放手术治疗肾癌的的对比研究[J].微创泌尿外科杂志,2014,3(6):377-379. 被引量:8
  • 2Klipfel J, Jacobson T M, Havel M. Radical nephrectomy with inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombectomy: implications for post - operativenursing care [J ]. Urol Nurs, 2010, 30 (6) : 347. 被引量:1
  • 3Bourdeanu L, Twardowski P, Pal S K. Nursing considera- tions with pazopanib therapy: focus on metastatic renal cell carcinoma[J]. Clin J Oncol Nuts, 2011, 15(5) : 513. 被引量:1
  • 4赵继来.后腹腔镜下保留肾单位肾部分切除术的方法探讨[J].中国农村卫生,2014,18(z1):355-356. 被引量:2
  • 5刘树志,包志远,孙庆年,等.比较后腹腔镜下与开放式两种肾癌根治术的疗效[J].中外健康文摘,2013,10:39-40. 被引量:2
  • 6Tan HJ,Wolf JS Jr,Ye Z,et al. Population-level comparative effectiveness of laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy for pa- tients with kidney cancer[ J ]. Cancer, 2011,117 ( 18 ) :4184 -4193. 被引量:1
  • 7Gabr AH, Gdor Y, Strope SA, et al. Approach and specimen han- dling do not influence oncological perioperative and long-term out- comes after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy [ J]. The Journal of Urology,2009,182 ( 3 ) : 874 - 880. 被引量:1
  • 8Savage SJ,Gill IS. Laparoscopic radical nepherectomy for renal cell carcinoma in a patient with level I renal vein tumor thrombus[J]. J Urology,2000,163(4) : 1243-1244. 被引量:1
  • 9Portis AJ, Y after laparos an Y, Landman J, et al. Long-term follow-up copic radical nephrectomy[J]. J Urol, 2002, 167(3) :1257-1262. 被引量:1
  • 10Wille AH, Roigas J, Deger S, et al. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: techniques, results and oncologica outcome in 125 consecutive cases[J]. Eur Urol,2004,45 (4) : 483- 489. 被引量:1

引证文献22

二级引证文献125

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部