期刊文献+

Ponzo错觉解释的合理性:倾斜恒常性理论的局限

Explainable Reasonability of Ponzo Illusion:the Limitation of Tilt Constancy Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用调节法考察了四种版本Ponzo错觉量,来检验倾斜恒常性这一解释Ponzo错觉的新理论。实验一发现,对称Ponzo错觉变异版本在水平线间距85mm和120mm时得到了较多的错觉量;实验二发现,不对称Ponzo错觉只有在水平线间距50mm时的错觉量符合倾斜恒常性理论。实验结果表明图形背景线、水平线间距和视角因素都是产生Ponzo错觉的重要因素,而倾斜恒常性理论过分强调了背景线的倾斜诱导效应,忽略了其他结构因素对Ponzo错觉的影响,故在解释Ponzo错觉时存在局限性。 Tilt constancy theory is a new but limited theory that explains Ponzo illusion. The theory claims that the tilt induction effect of tilt background line made the subjects have the different perception of two horizontal lines. But other researchers have different opinions from the Prinzmental's results. All of the disputes seemed to reflect the limitation inherent in the theory. The method of adjustment was employed. In the experiments,the fixed design 2 (viewpoints: 6°,2°) × 2 (illusion versions: standard,rectilinear) × 2 (distances of horizontal lines: 50mm,85mm and120mm) was used. The subjects were asked to adjust the distances of horizontal lines below by using the "PgDn"or "PgUp"key until they thought the distances of horizontallines below equaled the ones above. AVOVA was employed to analyze the figures calculated by the illusion magnitude formula. In Experiment1,the illusion magnitude of the symmetrical rectilinear version of Ponzo illusion was obtained,which is the same as Prinzmetal (2001) got when the distance of horizontal line was set to 50mm. However,under the condition of 85mm and120mm,we got more magnitude of illusion than that of the previous results; the different results did not support the tilt constancy theory. In Experiment 2,the illusion magnitude of the asymmetrical rectilinear version of Ponzo illusion was obtained,which is the same as Prinzmetal (2001) got when the distance of horizontal line was set to 50mm. However,under the condition of 85mm and120mm,we got more magnitude of illusion than that of the 50mm,and all of the illusion magnitudes of the asymmetrical rectilinear version of Ponzo illusion did not match well with the asymmetrical standard version. Namely,only when the distance of horizontal line was 50 mm did the result confirm the theory. The results from the research suggested: (1) The results from the Prizmental research may be obtainable only in specific conditions. (2) The Tilt Constancy theory had its limitations. It failed
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2013年第4期842-847,共6页 Journal of Psychological Science
基金 教育部人文社科基金项目(12YJA190022)的资助
关键词 倾斜恒常性理论 Ponzo错觉 视角 水平线间距 tilt-constancy theory Ponzo illusion viewpoint distance of horizontal lines
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1李小健,刘东台.视错觉产生的神经机制[J].心理科学进展,2008,16(4):555-561. 被引量:11
  • 2闫国利.服动分析法在心理学研究中的应用.天津:天津教育出版社.2004:256-257. 被引量:1
  • 3Fisher, G. H. (1968a). Gradients of distortion seen in the context of the Ponzo illusion and other contours, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 13, 212 - 217. 被引量:1
  • 4Fisher, G. H. (1968b). An experimental comparison of rectilinear and curvilinear illusions. British Journal of Psychology, 59, 23 -28. 被引量:1
  • 5Fisher, G. H. ( 1973 ). Toward a new explanation for the geometrical il- lusions: Ⅱ. Apparent depth or contour proximity. British Journal of Psychology, 64, 607 - 621. 被引量:1
  • 6Gibson, J. J. (1937). Adaptation, after- effect, and contrast in the perception of tilted lines :Ⅱ. Simultaneous contrast and the areal re- striction of the after - effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 553 -569. 被引量:1
  • 7Gibson, J. J. , & Radner, M. (1937). Adaptation, after- effect and contrast in the perception of tilted lines: Ⅰ. Quantitative studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20,453 - 467. 被引量:1
  • 8Haffenden, A. M. , & Goodle, M. A. (2000). Independent effects of pictorial displays on perception and action. Vision Research, 40, 1597-1670. 被引量:1
  • 9Nelson, W. W. , & Lofius, G. R. (1980). The tianctional visual tield during picture viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 391 - 399. 被引量:1
  • 10Prinzmetal, W. , & Beck, D. M. (2001). Tilt- constancy theory of vis- ual illusions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 206-217. 被引量:1

二级参考文献34

  • 1张厚粲,彭聃龄,孟庆茂.主观轮廓和深度线索[J].心理学报,1980,12(1):63-67. 被引量:6
  • 2林崇德 杨治良 黄希庭.心理学大词典[M].上海:上海教育出版社,2003.129. 被引量:5
  • 3Bechtel W. Philosophy of Science: An Overview for Cognitive Science. Hillsdale, N J: Erlbaum, 1988.44-48 被引量:1
  • 4Crick F. The Astonishing Hypothesis: The scientific search for the soul. New York: Touchstone, 1995.71-78 被引量:1
  • 5Zeki S. The neurology of ambiguity. Consciousness and Cognition, 2004, 13:173-196 被引量:1
  • 6Seghier M L, Vnilleumivr EFnnctional neuroimaging findings on the human perception of illusory contours. Neuroscience and Biohavioral Reviews, 2006, 30:595-612 被引量:1
  • 7Feldman R S. Essential of Understanding Psychology, 6th ed. USA: The McGraw-HiU Company,2005. 131 被引量:1
  • 8Gerrig R J, Zimbardo P G. Psychology and Life. 17th ed. USA: Pearson Education, Inc, 2004.98 被引量:1
  • 9Neisser U. Cognitive Psychology. New York: AppletonCentury-Crofts, 1967.6-8 被引量:1
  • 10Jedlicka P. Neuroethics, reductionism and dualism. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 2005, 9(4): 172 被引量:1

共引文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部