期刊文献+

药物专利VS公共健康:从冲突到共存 被引量:2

Pharmacy Patents VS Public Health: from Conflict to Coexist
下载PDF
导出
摘要 药物专利作为私权利具有垄断性的特点,但这种垄断特性与知识和发明作为公共物品的属性是相互冲突的。在经济社会全球一体化的今天,最贫困国家人民的健康权作为一种基本人权正在受到各种传染病的威胁。可是,现有的国际知识产权法律机制在某种程度上受到了来自发达国家制药寡头利益群体的俘获,导致现有法律机制对公共健康权利实现形成了不合作博弈的制度冲突。国际社会有必要通过利益协调的手段来构建药物专利权与国际公共健康权之间的良性权利生态,最终令各方在均能接受的前提下共同均摊相关利益成本。 As a private right, the pharmacy patent has the character of monopoly, which conflicts severely with the nature of knowledge and invention which are regarded as public goods. During the globalization process, people's health are threatened by the infectious diseases, especially in those most impoverished countries. To some degree, however, current international institutions of intellectual property has been captured by the toppest groups of pharmacy companies from developed countries. And this situation contributes to conflicts of non- cooperative game to public health rights. So the international society has to reform the regime of drug patent by means of interest coordination to build the optimum rights zoology between the patent and public health, in this way can the cost be shared fairly without harming the interests of any party too excessively.
作者 宋阳 左海聪
出处 《知识产权》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第7期59-64,共6页 Intellectual Property
基金 河北省软科学项目"自由贸易条件下的贸易安全问题"(项目编号:13457690D)资助
关键词 药物专利 公共健康权 制度冲突 权利生态 利益协调 pharmacy patents rights to public health institution conflicts rights zoology interest coordination
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献30

  • 1曾令良.论冷战后时代的国家主权[J].中国法学,1998(1):109-120. 被引量:119
  • 2World Health Orzanization.The World Health Reoort 144( 2001 ). 被引量:1
  • 3联合国发布2009年艾滋病最新情况报告(6:22).http://www.unmultimedia.org/radio/chinese/detail/132140.html. 被引量:1
  • 4卫生部艾滋病疫情评估:我国累计报告近327J例.http://news.ca.yahoo.com/09-12-/1028/2jquk.html. 被引量:1
  • 5奥德丽·R查普曼.将知识产权视为人权-与第15条第1款第(3)项有关的义务.版权公报(中文版),2001,(3). 被引量:2
  • 6国家知识产权局.WTO总理事会批准对TRIPS的修改.http://www.sipo.gov.cn/sipo2008/mtjj/2005/200804/t20080401-363138.html. 被引量:1
  • 7WTO.Workshop helps officials use health patent flexibilities.http: //www.wto.org/english/news_e/news06_e/trips_wp_27nov06_e. htm. 被引量:1
  • 8Report of the High Commissioner.The impact of the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights on Human Rights.E/CN. 4/Sub.2/2001/13. 被引量:1
  • 9Committee on Economic, Social and Cuhural Rights.The Nature of States Parties Obligations ( Art. 2, par. 1 of the Covenant ). General Comment No.3( 1900 ). 被引量:1
  • 10Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.Substantive Issues Arising in the Implementation of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.27th Sess. Agenda item 3, U. N. Doc. E/C. 12/2001/15( 2001 ). 被引量:1

同被引文献23

  • 1裴娜.行政公益诉讼的模式选择——再论检察机关公益诉讼的可行性[J].法学杂志,2010,31(S1):48-50. 被引量:3
  • 2左海聪.国际商事条约和国际商事惯例的特点及相互关系[J].法学,2007(4):97-100. 被引量:26
  • 3邹杨.论我国行政公益诉讼制度的困境与出路[J].黑龙江社会科学,2007(4):173-176. 被引量:2
  • 4《奥德赛》.13.429-438, 13.397, 4.312, 16.181-183, 16.187-188, 16. 194-195, 16.204, 16.216, 19.358-359,19. 380 -381, 19. 383 - 385, 19. 392, 19. 393 -466,19.485, 20.194, 21.195 -196, 21.197, 21.198,21. 202, 21. 203 - 204, 21. 207 - 208, 21. 209 - 211,21. 213 - 216, 21. 217 - 220, 21. 221 - 224, 24. 238,24.240, 24.239, 24.266-270, 24.297, 24.309-310, 24.316-317, 24.321, 24.331-335, 24.336 -344, 24.345-346, 24.348, 24.349, 24.351,4.112,1.1-3,1.66,2.120-122,14.122-130,23.215-217,19.467-475,17.454,20.346,9.19,14.459,20.185-239,14.390-392,1.291,11.75,21.231,21.413,21.217,23.225,24.329,11.126,23.273,11.174-196,24.216-217,9.224-230,24.311-314,2.146-156,2.177-182,2.15-16,24.327-329. 被引量:7
  • 5习近平.共同创造亚洲和世界的美好未来[N].人民日报.2013-04-08. 被引量:11
  • 6Bryan Druzin.Law without the State:the Theory of High Engagement and Emergence of Spontaneous Legal Order within Commercial Systems[J].Georgetown Journal of International Law,2010,(1). 被引量:1
  • 7Robert Cooter.Decentralized law for a complex economy:the structure approach to adjudicating the new law merchant[J].University of Pennsylvania Law Review,1996,(5). 被引量:1
  • 8Ernst Petersmann.Human Rights,International Economic Law and“Constitutional Justice”[J].European Journal of International Law,2008,(4). 被引量:1
  • 9Gabrielle Marceau.WTO Dispute Settlement and Human Rights[J].European Journal of International Law,2002,(4). 被引量:1
  • 10Sir Judge Brown.Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co[R].1893. 被引量:1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部