摘要
目的观察切缝挂线术与传统切开挂线术治疗复杂性肛瘘的临床效果。方法选择我院2010年1～6月收治的80例复杂性肛瘘患者分为两组各40例,A组给予切缝挂线术治疗,B组给予传统切开挂线术治疗,观察两组的临床治疗效果。结果 A组总有效率明显优于B组,两组比较具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。A组术后并发症发生率明显低于B组(P<0.05)。结论对于复杂性肛瘘患者采取切缝挂线术治疗,效果明显,术后并发症少,值得临床应用。
Objective To observe the clinical effect of lancing-thread-drawing procedure and traditional incision- thread-drawing procedure for complex anal fistula. Methods A total of 80 cases with complex anal fistula in our hos- pital from January 2010 to June 2010 were divided into two groups according to the different treatment methods. 40 cases in group A were given lancing-thread-drawing procedure,while 40 cases in group B were given traditional inci- sion-thread-drawing procedure. The clinical effect of two groups were observed. Results The total effective rate in group A was significantly better than that in group B,the difference of the total effective rate was significant between two groups （P 〈 0.05）. The incidence rate of postoperative complications in group A was significantly lower than that in group B,there was significant differences between two groups （P 〈 0.05）. Conclusion The clinical effect of lancing- thread-drawing procedure for complex anal fistula is better than that of traditional incision-thread-drawing procedure, and the postoperative complications are lesser. It is worth in clinical application.
出处
《中国现代医生》
2013年第18期127-128,共2页
China Modern Doctor
关键词
复杂性肛瘘
切缝挂线术
切开挂线术
Complex anal fistula
Lancing-thread-drawing procedure
Incision-thread-drawing procedure
