期刊文献+

生态系统服务的物质量与价值量评价方法的比较分析 被引量:316

Comparison analysis on physical and value assessment methods for ecosystems services
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对生态系统服务的物质量评价和价值量评价这两类评价方法进行比较 ,分析了这两类评价方法的优点和缺点 .结果表明 ,采用物质量和价值量两种不同的方法对同一个生态系统进行服务评价 ,往往会得出不同甚至相反的结论 ;对于不同的评价目的和不同的评价空间尺度 ,这两类评价方法的作用是有较大区别的 。 Physical assessment method (PAM) and value assessment method (VAM) for ecosystems services assessment were compared, and their strengths and weaknesses were analyzed. The comparison and analysis demonstrated that in some cases,different, even opposite results will be drawn with these two methods for the ecosystems services assessment of one ecosystem. The functions or effects of PAM and VAM are different for different assessment purposes or different spatial scales, but they will promote and complement each other to some extent.
出处 《应用生态学报》 CAS CSCD 2000年第2期290-292,共3页 Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目!(39770149)
关键词 生态系统服务 物质量评价 价值量评价 Ecosystems services, Assessment, Comparison
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

  • 11,Costanza R et al.1997.The value of the world's ecosystems services and natural capital.Nature,387: 253~260 被引量:1
  • 22,Daily G ed.1997.Nature's Service: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems.Island Press.Washington DC. 被引量:1

同被引文献3679

引证文献316

二级引证文献5818

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部