摘要
晚年恩格斯在《反杜林论》中确认了社会主义的现代形态,阐释了作为"科学"的社会主义是否可能与何以可能,而他在《卡.马克思〈1848年至1850年的法兰西阶级斗争〉一书导言》中对社会主义实现路径的论述则引来多种争论。坚持革命,还是选择议会道路,是这场争论的关键。充分利用欧洲民主制国家的议会斗争方式实现大多数人的利益,同时在发展滞后的国家进行社会革命,这种辩证考量反映了晚年恩格斯政治辩证法的特质,如今,我们仍然没有离开晚年恩格斯的思想地平线。
Engels in his later years confirmed the modern form of socialism in Anti-Duhring and explained whether and how the socialism as “science” is possible, while his discussion about the achieved path of socialism in Introduction to Karl Marx＇s The Class Struggles in France 1848 to 1850 led to a variety of arguments. It is the key of the argument adhere to revolution, or select parliamentary road？ Take full advantage of the parliament struggle in European democracy nations to achieve the interests of the majority, simultaneously advanced social revolution in the developing countries, which reflected practical characteristics of Engels＇ political dialectics in his later years. Nowadays, these two ideas for achieving socialism are still co-exist in global left-wing political discourse; we still have not left Engels＇ thought horizon in his later years.
出处
《北京行政学院学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第3期59-64,共6页
Journal of Beijing administration institute
基金
国家社会科学基金青年项目(10XNB064)
中央编译局社会科学基金项目(11B07)
关键词
科学
现代社会主义
晚年恩格斯
政治遗嘱
政治辩证法
science
modem socialism
Engels in his later years
political testament
political dialect
