摘要
量刑规范化改革改变了传统的量刑方法,建立了"以定量分析为主,定性分析为辅"的量刑方法,对人民法院的工作提出了新的更高的要求,同时出台《量刑指导意见(试行)》,要求法官以此为参考确定基准刑和对量刑情节加以合理的衡量和适用。在我国着力推进量刑规范化改革的背景下,法官的自由裁量权应当主动迎合改革的步伐,从提高法官自身素质、改善立法状况以及规范裁判文书制作等方面对法官自由裁量权进行规制,以实现量刑公正。
The reform of sentencing standardization is changing the traditional sentence method because it has built up the major qualitative analysis and minor quantitative analysis, which requires more to the court＇s jobs than before. Mean- while, the Guiding Opinions on Sentencing by the People＇s Courts （for Trial Implementation） require the judges determine the benchmark punishment and judge penalty circumstance . In the efforts to promote reform of sentencing, the judge＇s discretionary power should cater the pace of the reform actively. It is necessary to enhance judge＇own quality, improve the status of legislation, and make the juridical document standard and so on in order to realize the sentence justice.
出处
《山西农业大学学报（社会科学版）》
2013年第5期515-518,527,共5页
Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University:Social Science Edition
基金
2011年太原科技大学校青年基金项目(2011)
关键词
量刑规范化
自由裁量权
法官
量刑改革
基准刑
Sentencing standardization
Discretionary power
Judges
Sentencing reform
Benchmark punishment
