摘要
比较分析了扇吸式诱虫灯与频振式杀虫灯对稻田昆虫的诱捕效果及其对天敌的保护作用,结果表明,扇吸式诱虫灯对稻田主要昆虫的诱捕量高于频振式杀虫灯;扇吸式诱虫灯捕获的昆虫中,益虫和中性昆虫的存活率较高(>70%),而害虫死亡率为100%,频振式杀虫灯对害虫的致死率为100%,对益虫和中性昆虫的致死率也很高;从田间百株虫量看,2种杀虫灯对稻飞虱的控制及对蜘蛛的保护效果均较好,其中扇吸式诱虫灯的效果优于频振式杀虫灯。
The ensnaring effect on pests and the protecting pest-killing lamps, including the frequency trembler grid compared and analyzed. The results showed that FIL had effect on beneficial insects in rice fields of two kinds of lamp （FTGL） and the fan-inhaling lamp （FIL）, were a higher ensnaring amount of rice field insects than FT- GL. By FIL, all pests ensnared were killed while the beneficial and neutral insects ensnared had a high survival rate （ 〉70% ）. By FTGL, 100% of pests ensnared were killed and the beneficial and neutral insects ensnared had a very low survival rate （ both kinds of pest-killing ders, FIL was better than 〈 6% ）. Based on the insect （ rice fulgorid ＆ spider） quantity per 100 plants, although lamps had a good controlling effect on rice fulgorids and a good protecting effect on spi- FTGL in these effects.
出处
《杂交水稻》
CSCD
北大核心
2013年第3期58-63,共6页
Hybrid Rice
关键词
水稻
害虫
绿色防控
扇吸式诱虫灯
频振式杀虫灯
rice
pest
green pest management
fan-inhaling lamp
frequency trembler grid lamp
