期刊文献+

公立学校教育的“终结”和范式转换--美国课程研究的境遇与回应 被引量:1

The End of Public Education:Present Circumstances of Curriculum Studies in the United States
原文传递
导出
摘要 近年来,美国公立教育不断处在"被改革"的状态,这些改革都是合理的吗?存在哪些问题?本文从后概念重建主义课程研究的视角,对这些问题进行了反思。本文质疑了经济学对教育研究和课程研究领域的侵蚀,揭示出"技术中心主义"对美国公立学校教育的危害;在此基础上提出深化课程研究的必要性和紧迫性。面对美国公立学校教育濒临"终结"的状态,课程学者不应只沉浸在原有的概念体系中,课程研究可以从纵向(历史)研究和横向(视界)研究两条路径,通过借鉴国际课程领域的概念体系以及"复杂的对话",促使美国课程研究学科化,促成课程研究的新一轮范式转换,来理解和改造变化了的教育现实。 The deliberate destruction of public education summarizes thesituation in United States. There are insidious developments that undermine of the profession of teaching in the United States. Teaching- to- the- test positions technology as central to educational experience. Economists re- place education professors as the experts in federally funded educational research. And the plunde- ring of public budgets by private companies is another indication of the end of public education. Un- der these circumstances, two structures of disciplinarity that could support intellectual advancement in curriculum studies: verticality and horizontality, e.g. studies in the intellectual history of the field and analyses of its present circumstances. In the coming paradigm shift, sustained academic study of curriculum studies' intellectual histories and attuned analyses of present circumstances promises to precipitate a second reconeeptualization of curriculum studies.
出处 《全球教育展望》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第6期3-9,118,共8页 Global Education
基金 教育部人文社会科学规划项目“后现代文化视野下的课程研究”学术交流活动
关键词 课程研究 美国公立教育 后概念重建 课程史研究 课程国际化研究 curriculum studies public education post - reconceptualization intellectual history internationalization
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Lowrey, Annie. 2011, January 6. A Study [,inks Good Teachers to Lasting Gain. The New York Times Vol. CLXI (55, 642), A1, AI4. 被引量:1
  • 2Fuller, Steve. 1993. Disciplinary Boundaries and the Rhetoric of the Social Sciences. In Knowledges:Histor- ical and Critical Studies in Disciplinarity edited by Ellen Messer - Davidow, David R. Shumway, and David J. Sylvan ( 125 - 149). Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia. 被引量:1
  • 3Coyle, Diane. 2007. The Soulful Science: What Economists Really Do and Why It Matters. Princeton,N J: Princeton Univeity Press. 被引量:1
  • 4Saul, Stephanie. 2011. December 13. Profits and Questions at Online Charter Schools. Parents Getto Choose, but Standards Slip and Scores Suffer. The New York Times Vol. CLXI (55, 618), A1, A18 - AI9. 被引量:1
  • 5Silverman, Rachel Emma. 2012, January 31. Study: Face Time Benefits Preteens. The Wall Street Journal, Vol. CCLIX (No. 24), D2. 被引量:1
  • 6Richtel, Matt. 2011, November 5. Silicon Valley Wows Education, and Woos Them. The New York Times Vol. CLXI (55,580), A1, B7. 被引量:1
  • 7Pinar, William F. 2012. What Is Curriculum Theory? [ Second edition. I New York: Routledge. 被引量:1
  • 8Pinar, William F. 2010. Ed. Curriculum Studies in South Africa: Intellectual Histories, Present Circum- stances. New York: PMgrave Macmillan. 被引量:1

同被引文献15

  • 1汪霞.概念重建课程研究的后现代本质与评价[J].比较教育研究,2005,26(10):68-72. 被引量:12
  • 2Kim, Y. C. Transnational curriculum studies: Reconceptualization discourse in South Korea[ J ]. Curriculum Inquiry, 2010,40(4) :531 -554. 被引量:1
  • 3Pinar, W. F. Curriculum theory since 1950: Crisis, reconceptualization, internationalization[ J]. Handbook of curriculum and instruction, 2008 : 491 - 513. 被引量:1
  • 4Malewski, E. Curriculum Studies Handbook the Next Moment[ M]. Routledge, 2009: xi,xiii. 被引量:1
  • 5Malewski, E. Post - Reconceptualization [ A ]. Kridel, C. Encyclopedia of curriculum studies [C]. Sage, 2010: 669,670,670. 被引量:1
  • 6Apple, M. W. Doing things the "right" way: Legitimating educational inequalities in conservative times [ J ]. Educational Review, 2005,57 ( 3 ) : 271 - 293. 被引量:1
  • 7Au, W. Teaching under the new Taylorism: High - stakes testing and the standardization of the 21st century curriculum [ J ]. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 2011,43 ( 1 ) : 25 - 45. 被引量:1
  • 8Baker B. Provincializing curriculum? On the preparation of subjectivity for globality[ J]. Curriculum Inquir- y, 2010, 40(2) : 221 -240. 被引量:1
  • 9Hlebowitsh P. Centripetal Thinking in Curriculum Studies [ J ]. Curriculum Inquiry, 2010,40 (4) :503 - 513. 被引量:1
  • 10Malewski E. Proliferation as more and other to mutuality and synthesis within curriculum studies: A re- sponse to Hlebowitsh [ J ]. Curriculum Inquiry, 2010, 40 (4) : 514 - 526. 被引量:1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部