期刊文献+

食管动力和反流事件在声带息肉发病机制中的意义 被引量:14

Esophageal dynamic and laryngopharyngeal reflux play a role in pathogenesis of vocal cord polyps
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨咽喉反流和胃食管反流与声带息肉发病的关系。方法2011年10月至2012年5月期间就诊于南方医院的声带息肉患者32例,采用36通道ManoScan360^TM 固态高分辨率食管测压系统(high—resolutionesophagealmanometry)和Zephr多通道腔内阻抗-pH监测(muhichannelintralumminalimpedancecombinedwithpH—metry,MII—pH)便携系统进行监测,观察食管上、下括约肌压力、食管动力分段特点及咽喉反流、胃食管反流事件及反流物性质,并与16例健康成人对照组比较。结果声带息肉组较对照组平均食管上括约肌松弛持续时间、松弛恢复时间、食管下括约肌长度均缩短,食团内压最大平均值增加,差异均有统计学意义(t值分别为2.244、2.624、2.310和-2.397,P值均〈0.05)。声带息肉组咽喉反流发生率为40.6%(13/32),胃食管反流发生率为50.0%(16/32)。声带息肉组与对照组咽喉酸反流次数中位数(肘[P25;P75])分别为0.5[0.0;3.5]和0.0[0.0;0.0]次,酸反流时间分别为0.1[0.0;1.7]和0.0[0.0;0.0]min,酸清除时间分别为3.5[0.0;53.5]和0.0[0.0;0.0]S,DeMeester评分分别为14.8[1.6;31.3]和1.8[1.1;4.1]分,总计液体反流次数分别为46.5[25.3;69.0]和32.5[20.0;36.3]次。声带息肉组咽喉酸反流次数、酸反流时间、酸清除时间、DeMeester评分及总液体反流次数均较对照组增加,差异均有统计学意义(z值分别为2.481、2.767、2.767,2.344及1.980,P值均〈0.05)。结论声带息肉部分患者存在食管上、下括约结构与功能障碍,存在咽喉反流和胃食管反流,反流事件以立位酸反流为主。 Objective Through monitoring esophageal dynamic change, and detection of laryngopharyngeal reflux(LPR) and gastroesophageal reflux events,to discuss the relationship of vocal cord polyps with laryngopharyngeal reflux. Methods Thirty-two patients with vocal cord polyps were diagnosed by electronic laryngoscopy in Nanfang Hospital between October 2011 to May 2012. 3"his study applied high- resolution esophageal manometry (HRM) and ambulatory 24-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring( MII-pH )to obtain the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) and lower esophageal sphincter pressure, characteristics of sectional esophageal motility ; laryngopharyngeal reflux ( LPR ) and gastroesophageal reflux events, as well as the reflux properties of substances. Sixteen healthy volunteers were recruited as normal controls. Results UES relaxation duration, duration of UES relaxation time, UES relaxation recovery time and mean length of LES were all shorter than those of the control group ( t were 2. 244, 2. 624, 2.310 and -2.397, P〈0.05). There were 40. 6% (13/32) LPR and 50. 0% (16/32) gastroesophageal reflux found in vocal polyp patients. Median number (M[ P25 ; P75 ] ) of laryngopharyngeal acid reflux events were 0. 5[0. 0;3.5] and 0. 0[0. 0;0. 0] in vocal polyp group and the controls, median mean time of laryngopharyngeal acid exposure 0. 1 [ 0. 0 ; 1.7 ] and 0. 0 [ 0. 0 ; 0. 0 ]min, median clearance time of laryngopharyngeal acid were 3.5 [ 0. 0 ; 53.5] and 0. 0 [ 0. 0 ; 0. 0 ] s, median scores of DeMeester were 14. 8[ 1.6;31.3] and 1.8[ 1.1 ;4. 1] and median frequency of total liquid reflux episodes were 46. 5[25.3 ;69. 0] and 32. 5 [ 20. 0;36. 3 ], respectively. The median numbers of laryngopharyngeal acid reflux events, time of acid exposure, time of acid clearance, DeMeester scores and frequency of total liquid reflux episodes were increased or higher in vocal polyp group than those in the controls (z were 2. 481, 2. 767, 2. 767, 2. 344 and 1. 980, P 〈 0.05 ). Concl
出处 《中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第6期455-460,共6页 Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery
关键词 声带 息肉 咽喉反流 胃食管反流 Vocal cords Polyps Laryngopharyngeal reflux Gastroesophageal reflux
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1Koufman JA, Amin MR, Panetti M. Prevalence of reflux in 113 consecutive patients with laryngeal and voice disorders. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2000, 123 (4) : 385-388. 被引量:1
  • 2Martins RH, Defaveri J, Domingues MA, et al. Vocal polyps: clinical, morphological, and immunohistoehemical aspects. J Voice, 2011 , 25(1 ) : 98-106. 被引量:1
  • 3Kantas I, Balatsouras DG, Kamargianis N, et al. The influence of laryngopharyngeal reflux in the healing of laryngeal trauma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2009, 266(2) : 253-259. 被引量:1
  • 4郑杰元,张立红,李晶兢,李进让,Chieh-Fu Jeff Cheng.咽喉反流症状指数量表中文版的信度及效度评价[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2012,47(11):894-898. 被引量:100
  • 5Belafsky PC, Postma GN, Koufman JA. The validity and reliability of the reflux finding score (RFS). Laryngoscope, 2001, 111(8): 1313-1317. 被引量:1
  • 6Ford CN. Evaluation and management of laryngopharyngeal reflux. JAMA, 2005, 294(12): 1534-1540. 被引量:1
  • 7Vardar R, Sweis R, Anggiansah A, et al. Upper esophageal sphincter and esophageal motility in patients with chronic cough and reflux : assessment by high-resolution manometry. Dis Esophagus, 2013, 26(3): 219-225. 被引量:1
  • 8Merati AL, Lim HJ, Ulualp SO, et al. Meta-analysis of upper probe measurements in normal subjects and patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 2005, 114 (3) : 177-182. 被引量:1
  • 9Wang A J, Liang M J, Jiang AY, et al. Gastroesophageal and laryngopharyngeal reflux detected by 24-hour combined impedance and pH monitoring in healthy Chinese volunteers. J Dig Dis, 2011, 12(3): 173-180. 被引量:1
  • 10Johnson LF, DeMeester TR. Development of the 24-hour intraesophageal pH monitoring composite scoring system. J Clin Gastroenterol, 1986, 8 Suppl 1 : 52-58. 被引量:1

二级参考文献16

  • 1全国血压抽样调查协作组.饮酒与血压:1991年抽样调查结果[J].高血压杂志,1995,3(A01):50-54. 被引量:39
  • 2Kenneth R. Devault,Donald Ocastell,蔡联英(译),梁列新(审校).胃食管反流病诊断和治疗的最新指南[J].广西医学,2005,27(8):1297-1298. 被引量:40
  • 3Koufman JA. Laryngopharyngeal reflux 2002: a new paradigm of airway disease. Ear Nose Throat J, 2002, 81 (9 Suppl 2) : 2-6. 被引量:1
  • 4Belafsky PC, Postma GN, Amin MR, et al. Symptoms and findings of laryngopharyngeal reflux. Ear Nose Throat J, 2002, 81 (9 Suppl 2) : 10-13. 被引量:1
  • 5Belafsky PC, Postma GN, Koufman JA. Validity and reliability of the reflux symptom index (RSI). J Voice, 2002, 16: 274-277. 被引量:1
  • 6李进让,陈曦.咽喉反流性疾病//韩德民.2006耳鼻咽喉头颈外科新进展.北京:人民卫生出版社,2006:288-304. 被引量:1
  • 7Belafsky PC, Postma GN, Koufman JA. The validity and reliability of the reflux finding score (RFS). Laryngoscope, 2011, 111:1313-1317. 被引量:1
  • 8Park KH, Choi SM, Kwon SU, et al. Diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux among globus patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2006, 134: 81-85. 被引量:1
  • 9Knight J, Lively MO, Johnston N, et al. Sensitive pepsin immunoassay for detection of laryngopharyngeal reflux. Laryngoscope, 2005, 115: 1473-1478. 被引量:1
  • 10Karkos PD, Wilson JA. Empiric treatment of laryngopharyngeal reflux with proton pump inhibitors : a systematic review. Laryngoscope, 2006, 116: 144-148. 被引量:1

共引文献110

同被引文献165

引证文献14

二级引证文献136

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部