摘要
为比较留置肠梗阻导管与胃管在治疗术后早期炎性肠梗阻的疗效，回顾性分析留置胃管和肠梗阻导管治疗术后早期炎性肠梗阻48例患者的临床资料，并进行疗效比较。其中18例留置肠梗阻导管治疗（肠梗阻导管组）和30例留置胃管治疗（胃管组），结果显示，两组在引流量、腹围缩小程度、肛门排气时间、进食时间、患者的自身感受及拔管时间方面均有明显差异（P〈0．05），留置肠梗阻导管有明显的优势。结果表明，留置肠梗阻导管应作为治疗术后早期炎性肠梗阻的首选方法。
This study was to compare the clinical efficacy of indwelling gastric tube and ileus tube in trea- ting early postoperative inflammatory ileus. A retrospective study was carried out on the clinical data of 48 cases of early postoperative inflammatory ileus treated with indwelling gastric tube or ileus tube. The clini- cal efficacy was compared. As results, 18 cases of intestinal obstruction receiving ileus tube and 30 cases re- eeiving gastric tube, significant difference was found in volume of drainage, abdominal circumference reduc- ing extent,time for flatus,time for feeding,patients＇ feelings and extubation time（ P 〈0.05）, ileus tube was superior to gastric tube. It is concluded that ileus tube should be the first choice of treatment for early postoperative inflammatory ileus.
出处
《中国肛肠病杂志》
2013年第5期16-17,共2页
Chinese Journal of Coloproctology
关键词
肠梗阻
胃管
肠梗阻导管
Intestinal obstruction
Gastric tube
Ileus tube
