摘要
目的探讨荧光素眼底血管造影（FFA）与吲哚青绿血管造影（ICGA）诊断外伤性脉络膜破裂的优缺点。方法回顾性分析25例（25只眼）外伤性脉络膜破裂患者临床资料。25例（25只眼）均行荧光素眼底血管造影及吲哚青绿造影检查。结果FFA：12只眼（48％）造影早期条形、弧形透见荧光或弱荧光，晚期弱荧光或着染；3只眼（12％）视网膜出血灶内或边界处荧光着染；10只眼仅见出血遮蔽，无其他荧光。ICGA检查：25只眼（100％）均可见脉络膜破裂灶，不受出血影响。结论FFA联合ICGA检查诊断外伤性脉络膜破裂可以互补不足。ICGA检查不受眼底出血影响，可以清楚显示破裂灶。
Objective To study the advantages and disadvantages of diagnosis traumatic choroid rupture by fundus fluorescein angiography （FFA） and indole green angiography （ICGA）. Methods The retrospective analyzed the clinical material of 25 cases （25 eyes） with traumatic choroidal rupture. Twenty-five cases （25 eyes） were examined with FFA and ICGA. Results FFA： In 12 eyes angiography early strip, arc transmitted fluorescence or weak fluorescence, advanced weak fluorescence or dyed; In 3 eyes with retinal hemorrhage foci within or at the boundary of fluorescent staining; 10 eyes only hemorrhage. ICGA examination： 25 eyes （100%） were visible choroidal rupture range, without bleeding effect. Contusions FFA combined with ICGA inspection diagnosis traumatic choroidal rupture can be complementary. ICGA examination isn＇t affected by the fundus hemorrhage. It can be displayed rupture.
出处
《中国实用眼科杂志》
CSCD
北大核心
2013年第5期620-622,共3页
Chinese Journal of Practical Ophthalmology
关键词
造影
脉络膜破裂
Angiography
Choroidal rupture
