摘要
今道友信关于审美判断的考察与对康德理论的批判,是在以康德为代表的近代美学的趣味感性论和以柏拉图为典型的古希腊美学的理性的存在论之间的冲突中展开的。在今道友信的形而上学思考中,这两方面理论主张对撞的结果是柏拉图式的思索占据了优势,并且显示了向现代美学理论行进的富有兴味的轨迹,今道友信认为这是审美判断的事象本身开示了对于此问题的古典思考的重要性。今道友信对于审美判断理论思索的结论,与其关于美以及美本身的形而上学规定有最根本的关系。
Imamichi Tomonobu＇s investigation on aesthetic judgement and the criticism on Kant＇s theory are based on the conflict between the interest sensibility of modern aesthetics represented by Kant and the ontological arguments of ancient Greek aesthetics advocated by Plato. According to Imamichi Tomonobu＇s metaphysical viewspoints, Plato＇s way of thinking is dominant in the conflict and shows an interesting track of transformation to modern aesthetics. He believes that aesthetic judgement itself demonstrates the importance of classic thinking. Such conclusion relates directly with his metaphysical standards of beauty and beauty itself.
出处
《延边大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
2013年第3期136-144,共9页
Journal of Yanbian University：Social Science Edition
基金
黑龙江省艺术科学规划课题重点项目(12A088)
关键词
今道友信
康德
审美判断
批判
Imamichi Tomonobu
Kant
aesthetic judgement
criticism
