期刊文献+

头孢西丁治疗快速生长型非结核分枝杆菌肺病的疗效分析 被引量:10

Efficacy of cefoxitin in treatment of rapidly growing nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察头孢西丁用于治疗快速生长型非结核分枝杆菌(rapidly growing nontuberculous mycobacteria,RGM)肺病患者的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析经确诊的快速生长型非结核分枝杆菌肺病患者24例资料及治疗情况。观察患者的痰菌阴转率、影像学表现及不良反应。结果 24例中耐链霉素23例,耐异烟肼24例,耐利福平21例,耐乙胺丁醇18例,耐阿米卡星20例,耐卷曲霉素23例,耐氧氟沙星22例。治疗2周后患者的临床症状均缓解,10例在治疗半年内痰菌阴转并维持至疗程结束,另14例的痰菌未能阴转。疗程结束时7例病灶吸收,其中4例为显著吸收,3例为吸收;1 7例病灶无变化;4例空洞闭合,3例空洞缩小,17例空洞无改变。治疗痊愈率为41.7%(10/24)。未出现因头孢西丁引起的不良反应。结论快速生长型NTM肺疾病头孢西丁有其治疗价值,在无条件行菌种鉴定和药敏检测的前提下,可联合其他药物组成经验性化疗方案。 Objective To evaluate the therapeutic effect and safety of cefoxitin for rapidly growing nontuberculous mycobacteria (RGM) pulmonary disease. Methods Twenty four patients with RGM pulmonary disease aged 32-76 admitted from January 2007 to December2009 were included in the study. The patients were treated previously and still with sputum positive. A new regimen containing cefoxitin, fluoroquinolone, macrolid, parenteral aminoglycoside and SMZco were adopted. Cefoxitin was used in the first 3 months and lasted for 18 months. Sputum conversion rate, radiology change and side effects were observed before and after the therapy. Results Among the 24 bacterial isolates, 23 strains were resistant to streptomycin,24 to isoniazid,21 to rifampin, 18 to ethambutol, 20 to amikacin,23 to capreomycin and 22 to ofloxacin. After 2 weeks of treatment, the clinical symptoms were improved inall patients. In 10 patients sputum was converted to negative after 6 months of treatment and remained to the end of therapy, while other 14 patients were still sputum positive. Seven patients showed radiological improvement. There were no side effects observed. The total cure rate was 41. 7% (10/24). Conclusion The regimen containing cefoxitin has certain clinical efficacy for RGM nontuborculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease.
作者 方勇 沙巍
出处 《同济大学学报(医学版)》 CAS 2013年第2期51-54,共4页 Journal of Tongji University(Medical Science)
关键词 分枝杆菌 头孢西丁 治疗 mycobacterium cefoxitin therapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献47

  • 1贺伟,潘纪戍,周新华.非结核分枝杆菌肺病的影像学表现[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,2004,27(8):553-556. 被引量:20
  • 2中华医学会结核病科学会.非典型分支杆菌肺病诊断试行标准[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,1988,11:41-41. 被引量:4
  • 3范新会.单晶连铸技术研究[M].西北工业大学,1997.. 被引量:2
  • 4D.麦克林 李顺华(译).金属的晶粒间界[M].北京:科学出版社,1965.. 被引量:1
  • 5DUGDLE J S 朱道康等(译).金属与合金的电学性质[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1988.. 被引量:1
  • 6莫纯昌 倪明生.物理电子技术中的材料与工艺[M].北京:国防工业出版社,1992.. 被引量:2
  • 7蔡慧梅 梅建 等.上海市非典型分支杆菌调查研究[J].中国防痨通讯,1988,1:23-25. 被引量:1
  • 8全国结核病流行病学抽样调查领导小组.1979年全国结核病流行病学抽样调查综合报告[J].中国防痨通讯,1982,2:3-6. 被引量:1
  • 9Griffith DE, Aksamit T, Brown-Elliott BA, et al. An official ATS/IDSA statement: diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of nontubereulous myeobacterial diseases [J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2007,175(4):367-416. 被引量:1
  • 10Aksamit TR. Hot tub lung: infection, inflammation, or both? [J]. Semin Respir Infect, 2003,18(1):33-39. 被引量:1

共引文献1405

同被引文献75

  • 1黎惠如,谢智恩,刘曾维.中医辅助治疗对非结核分枝杆菌肺病CT影像表现的影响[J].影像研究与医学应用,2019,3(14):58-59. 被引量:1
  • 2何国钧,肖和平.非结核分枝杆菌病的治疗研究进展[J].抗感染药学,2005,2(2):60-63. 被引量:19
  • 3Metwally L,Gomaa N,Hassan R.Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus directly by loop-mediated isothermal amplification and direct cefoxitin disk diffusion tests[J].East Mediterr Health J,2014,20(4):273-279. 被引量:1
  • 4Penna B,Rabello RF,Lilenbaum W.Comparison of cefoxitin disk diffusion test and mecA gene PCR results for methicillin resistance detection in Staphylococcus intermedius group isolates from canine origin in Brazil[J].Braz J Microbiol,2014,45(1):235-237. 被引量:1
  • 5Guet-Revillet H,Emirian A,Groh M.Pharmacological Study of Cefoxitin as an Alternative Antibiotic Therapy to Carbapenems in Treatment of Urinary Tract Infections Due to Extended-Spectrum-β-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli[J].Antimicrob Agents Chemother,2014,58(8):4899-4901. 被引量:1
  • 6Dien Bard J,Hindler JA,Gold HS,et al.Rationale for eliminating Staphylococcus breakpoints forβ-lactam agents other than penicillin,oxacillin or cefoxitin,and ceftaroline[J].Clin Infect Dis,2014,58(9):1287-1296. 被引量:1
  • 7Bellows CF, Mills KT, Kelly TN, etal. Combination of oral non-absorbable and intravenous antibiotics versus intravenous antibiotics alone in the prevention of surgical site infections after colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized con- trolled trialsEJ3. Tech Coloproctol, 2011,15 (4) : 385-395. 被引量:1
  • 8Itani KMF, Hawn MT. Prevention of surgical site infection in colorectal surgery[J]. Colorec Can,2013,2(5):467-475. 被引量:1
  • 9Ho VP, Barie PS, Stein SL, et al. Antibiotic regimen and the timing of prophylaxis are important for reducing surgical site infection after elective abdominal colorectal surgery[J]. Surg infect,2011,12(4) :255-260. 被引量:1
  • 10Mahajan SN, Ariza-Heredia EJ, Rolston KV,etal. Perioper- ative antimicrobial prophylaxis for intra-abdominal surgery in patients with cancer: a retrospective study comparing ertap- enem and nonertapenem antibiotics[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2014,21(2) :513-519. 被引量:1

引证文献10

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部