期刊文献+

道德责任判断的合理依据及其界定假说——以神经科学为视角 被引量:1

The Reasonable Basis of Moral Responsibility Judgment and Its' Defining Hypothesis: a Neuroscience Perspective
下载PDF
导出
摘要 神经科学的发展特别是神经成像技术的应用对传统的道德责任判断提出了巨大的挑战,使其步履维艰。丘奇兰德认为,借助道德判断的神经基础以及道德行为自控的N维参数空间假说,我们有可能找出道德理性的神经基础和大概范围。本文我们尝试利用神经科学发展的这些最新成果,分析道德责任判断的合理依据及其界定假说,期待传统道德责任判断能够走出困境,全面保证其公正性和合理性,并对此假说进行哲学层面上的思考。 The development of neuroscience, especially the application of neuroimaging technology, has brought many new ethical challenges on the judgment of moral responsibility. However, Paul M. Churchland argues that by analyzing the neurobiology basis of moral judgment and the N dimensionality space hypothesis of moral behavior, it is possible to figure out the neural basis of moral rationality and the probably range of ration- ality. In this article, the author try to use the assumption to let moral responsibility judgment out of dilemma and ensure its' impartiality and rationality, meanwhile the author try to make philosophical reflection.
作者 刘星
出处 《华中科技大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第3期101-106,共6页 Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)
基金 国家社科基金重大项目(11&ZD177) 国家社科基金重点项目(12AZD071) 湖南省博士生科研创新项目(CX2011B039)
关键词 道德责任 神经基础 界定假说 moral responsibility neural - basis defining - hypothesis
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1唐凯麟,邓名瑛主编..中国伦理学名著提要[M].长沙:湖南师范大学出版社,2001:476.
  • 2高新民、刘占峰:《心灵的解构--心灵哲学本体论变革研究》,北京:中国社会科学出版社2005年版. 被引量:1
  • 3高新民,沈学君著..现代西方心灵哲学[M].武汉:华中师范大学出版社,2010:687.
  • 4罗跃嘉主编..认知神经科学教程[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2006:472.
  • 5Judy Illes. Neuroethics: Defining the issues in theory, practice, and policy, New York: Oxford University Press, 2004. 被引量:1
  • 6张立立.神经伦理学视角下的道德判断[J].自然辩证法通讯,2008,30(3):88-92. 被引量:3
  • 7Joshua D: Greene. et al. "An fMRI Investigation of'E- motional Engagement in Moral Judgement ", Science, 2001(14). 被引量:1
  • 8《辞海》(缩印本),上海:上海辞书出版社1979版. 被引量:1
  • 9(德)伊曼努尔·康德:《道德形而上学原理》,苗力田译,上海:上海世纪出版社2007年版. 被引量:1
  • 10Patricia Smith Churchland. "J: Moral Decision - mak- ing and the Brain", In Judy llles : Neuroethics : Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy, Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2004. 被引量:1

二级参考文献17

  • 1J. Greene, From neural ' is'to moral 'ought': what are the moral implications of nettroscientific moral psychology? Nature Reviews. Neuroscience 4 (2003). pp. 847-850. 被引量:1
  • 2W. D. Casebeer, Moral cognition and its neural constituents. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience 4 (2003), pp. 841 -847. 被引量:1
  • 3J. Haidt, The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review 108 (2001), pp. 814 - 834. 被引量:1
  • 4J. Greene/J. Haidt, How (and where) does moral judgment work? Trends in Cogrdtive Science 6 (21302), P. 517- 523,p. 517. 被引量:1
  • 5P. Foot, The problem of abortion and the doctrine of the double effect, Oxford Review 5 (1967), pp. 5 - 15. 被引量:1
  • 6J. D. Greene et al., An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in rnoral judgment, Science 293 (2001), pp. 2105- 2108, p. 2106. 被引量:1
  • 7H. Arendt, Elemente und Ursprunge totaler Herrschaft, Frankfurt am Main 1985, p. 930. 被引量:1
  • 8P. J. Eslinger/A. R. Damasio, Severe distm.bance of higher cognition after bilateral frontal lobe ablation: patient EVR, Neurology 35 (1985), P. 1731 - 1741 . 被引量:1
  • 9J. L Saver/A. R. Damasio, Preserved access and processing of social knowledge in a patient with acquired sociopathy due to ventromedial frontal damage, Neuropsychologia 29 ( 1991 ), pp. 1241 - 1249. 被引量:1
  • 10S. D. Pretson/F. B. M. de Wall, Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (2002), pp. 1-72. 被引量:1

共引文献4

同被引文献6

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部