期刊文献+

子宫动脉化疗栓塞治疗瘢痕妊娠的Meta分析 被引量:37

Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of UACE and systematic MTX in the treatment of CSP
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价子宫动脉化疗栓塞术(uterine artery chemoembolization,UACE)与甲氨蝶呤肌内注射(methotrexate,MTX)系统治疗相比,在治疗剖宫产子宫瘢痕部位妊娠(cesarean scar,CSP)方面的有效性和安全性。方法检索国内外的数据库Cochrane图书馆、PubMed、EMBASE、中国生物医学文献数据库、CNKI、维普中文科技期刊数据库和万方数据库,纳入有关子宫动脉化疗栓塞术治疗瘢痕妊娠的随机对照试验(randomized controlled trial,RCT),评价文献的方法学质量,并采用Revman 5.0软件进行Meta分析。结果共纳入19项研究,913名病例。Meta分析结果显示:UACE与MTX全身治疗相比,成功率、术中出血量、血β-HCG降到正常时间、住院时间、严重合并症,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05);而轻度不良反应、住院费用的比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 UACE治疗CSP的疗效优于系统MTX治疗,且UACE联合清宫具有术中出血量、严重合并症少,血β-HCG降到正常时间短,住院时间短的优点,值得临床推广。由于综合分析的试验数量较少、质量不高,影响了结果的可靠性,仍需大样本,多中心的临床随机对照试验来进一步完善,才能更好地客观评价UACE技术。 Objective The objective of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of uterine artery chemoembolization(UACE) vs systemic methotrexate(MTX) for pregnancy within a cesarean scar(CSP). Methods A database was constructed for the articles on relevant clinical trials on UACE treated with CSP, which were searched from PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, China Biological Medicine Database, CNKI,VIP, WanFang, and through contact with experts in the field from January 1995 to March 2012. The Revman 5.0 software was used for Meta-analysis according to Cochrane system evaluation method. Results Nineteen studies involving 913 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that there were significant differences in success rate, bleeding volumes during uterine curettage, recovered β-hCG to normal values, hospitalization time, and severe adverse effects (P〈0. 05); there were no significant differences in mild side effects and hospitalization costs( P〉0.05 ). Conclusion Compared with systematic MTX, UACE followed by suction curettage for CSP appeared to have more advantages and may be a priority option. But the study is limited to the original quality, quantity as well as the differences between the treatment programs of the study, the above conclusion only for clinicians to reference. Nevertheless, more multicenter, large-scale randomized controlled trials(RCTs) are still needed to get more high-quality evidence that to update this system.
出处 《首都医科大学学报》 CAS 2013年第2期275-281,共7页 Journal of Capital Medical University
基金 北京市科学技术委员会科技计划资助项目(Z131107001012031)~~
关键词 瘢痕妊娠 子宫动脉化疗栓塞 系统MTX治疗 META分析 cesarean scar pregnancy uterine artery chemoembolization systematic methotrexate Meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献36

  • 1Jurkovic D, Hillaby K, Woelfer B, et al. First-trimester di- agnosis and management of pregnancies implanted into the lower uterine segment cesarean section scar [ J ]. Ultra- sound Obstet Gynecol, 2003,21 (3) :220-227. 被引量:1
  • 2Seow K M, Huang L W, Lin Y H, et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy: Issues in manage-ment [ J ]. Uhrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2004,23 ( 3 ) :247-253. 被引量:1
  • 3Ravina J H, Herbreteau D, Ciraru-Vigneron N, et al. Mer- land. Arterial embolisation to treat uterine myomata [ J ]. Lancet, 1995,346(8976) :671-672. 被引量:1
  • 4Li C, Li C, Feng D, et al. Transcatheter arterial chemoem- bolization versus systemic methotrexate for the management of cesarean sear pregnancy [ J ]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2011,113(3) :178-182. 被引量:1
  • 5Lian F, Wang Y, Chen W, et al. Uterine artery emboliza- tion combined with local methotrexate and systemic metho- trexate for treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy with differ- ent uhrasonographic pattern[J]. Cardiovasc Intervent Radi- ol, 2012,35(2) :286-291. 被引量:1
  • 6Wu X, Zhang X, Zhu J, et al. Caesarean scar pregnancy: comparative efficacy and safety of treatment by uterine artery chemoembolization and systemic methotrexate injection[ J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2012,161 ( 1 ) :75-79. 被引量:1
  • 7Yang X Y, Yu H, Li Km, et al. Uterine artery embolisati- on combined with local methotrexate for treatment of caesar- ean scar pregnancy[J]. BJOG, 2010,117(8) :990-996. 被引量:1
  • 8Zhuang Y, Huang Lili. Uterine artery embolization com- pared with methotrexate for the management of pregnancy implanted within a cesarean scar [ J ]. Am J Obstet Gyne- col, 2009,201 ( 2 ) : 152e1- 152e3. 被引量:1
  • 9陈丽平,刘曼华.剖宫产瘢痕部位妊娠介入治疗临床分析[J].南通大学学报(医学版),2007,27(5):426-426. 被引量:9
  • 10郭久柏,张琦.子宫动脉栓塞与甲氨蝶呤治疗子宫切口妊娠的比较研究[J].天津医药,2010,38(5):429-430. 被引量:36

二级参考文献99

共引文献344

同被引文献266

引证文献37

二级引证文献266

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部