期刊文献+

追问“基因选择” 被引量:2

Questioning “Genic Selectionism”
下载PDF
导出
摘要 "基因选择",或"自私基因"假说是解决"自然选择单位"问题的主要进路之一。"自私基因"假说认为,基因是自然选择的最终单位。但批评"基因选择"的"因果扭曲论证"断言,自然选择可以作用在个体、群体等层次,从而造成基因频率的改变,"基因选择"误解了自然选择过程中的因果关系。然而,此论证忽略了由中心法则保证的基因-性状/行为间的因果关系,并不能真正驳倒"基因选择"。 Genic selectionism or the selfish gene hypothesis is a major approach to the units of natural selection in philosophy of biology.The hypothesis argues that gene is the ultimate unit of natural selection.Anti-genic selectionists refute it by 'The Causal Distortion Argument',which claims that selection can work at higher levels and then produce changes at the genic level.It indicates that genic selectionism distorts the causal process of natural selection.However,this argument cannot overturn genic selectionism,since it neglects the causal relationship between genes and trait/behaviours.This relationship is ensured by the Central Dogma.
作者 陈勃杭 王巍
机构地区 清华大学科学
出处 《哲学分析》 2013年第2期147-154,199,共8页 Philosophical Analysis
关键词 自然选择单位 基因选择 因果扭曲论证 中心法则 the units of natural selection genic selectionism The Causal Distortion Argument the Central Dogma
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1李建会.自然选择的单位:个体、群体还是基因?[J].科学文化评论,2009,6(6):19-29. 被引量:9
  • 2(英)里查德·道金斯(Richard,Dawkins)著,卢允中等译..自私的基因[M].长春:吉林人民出版社,1998:386.
  • 3Samir Okasha.The “averaging fallacy” and the levels of selection[J].Biology and Philosophy.2004(2) 被引量:1
  • 4Dawkins,R.Replicator selection and the extended phenotype[].Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie.1978 被引量:1
  • 5Reeve,H.K.,Keller,L.,Keller,L.Levels of Selection: Burying the Units-of-Selection Debate and Unearthing the Crucial New Issues[].Levels of Selection in Evolution.1999 被引量:1
  • 6Sinclair J,Brazil D.Teacher Talk[]..1982 被引量:1
  • 7Midgley,M.Gene Juggling[].Philosophy.1979 被引量:1
  • 8Waters,C.K.Tempered Realism about the Forces of Selection[].Philosophy of Science.1991 被引量:1
  • 9R.Dawkins."Replicators and vehicles"[].GenesOrganismsPopulations:Controversies over the Units of Selec-tion.1982 被引量:1
  • 10Charlesworth,Deborah,Willis,John H."The genetics of inbreeding depression"[].Nature Reviews Genetics.2009 被引量:1

二级参考文献1

  • 1(美)乔治·威廉斯(GeorgeC.Williams)著,陈蓉霞.适应与自然选择[M]上海科学技术出版社,2001. 被引量:1

共引文献8

同被引文献22

  • 1Wilson R A.2007. Levels of selection[CYI Matthen M, Stephens C. Philosophy of biology. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2007:141-162. 被引量:1
  • 2Sterelny K, Kitcher P. The return of the gene[J]. TheJournal of Philosophy, 1988,85(7): 339-361. 被引量:1
  • 3Brandon R. The levels of selection[C]//PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Associa?tion. Philosophy of Science Association, 1982: 315-323. 被引量:1
  • 4Sober E, Wilson D S. A critical review of philosophical work on the units of selection problem[J]. Philosophy of Science, 1994: 534-555. 被引量:1
  • 5Dawkins R. The extended phenotype[M]. Revised edition. Ox?ford: Oxford University Press, 1999,238. 被引量:1
  • 6Brandon R N, Nijhout H F. The Empirical Nonequivalence of Genic and Genotypic Models of Selection: A(Decisive) Refutation of Genic Selectionism and Pluralistic Genic Selectionism[J]. Philosophy of Science, 2006, 73(3): 277-297. 被引量:1
  • 7Strickberger M W. Evolution[M](3rd). Sudbury:Jones and Bartlett Publishers, 2000.534-537. 被引量:1
  • 8Sober E, Lewontin R C. Artifact, cause and genic selection[J]. Philosophy of science, 1982: 157-1800. 被引量:1
  • 9Weinberger N. Is There an Empirical Disagreement between Genic and Genotypic Selection Models? A Response to Brandon and Nijhout[J]. Philosophy of Science, 2011, 78(2): 225-237. 被引量:1
  • 10Dawkins, R. The Selfish Gene[M]. 30th anniversary edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. 被引量:1

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部