摘要
明代何景明曾在《杂言十首》中谓:"经亡而骚作,骚亡而赋作,赋亡而诗作。秦无经,汉无骚,唐无赋,宋无诗。"他的这种"文体代变"的文学观念虽有"一代有一代之文学"的萌芽,却有些过于绝对,言于轻率。对当代学者莫砺锋《江西诗派研究》和阮忠《唐宋诗风流别史》这两部著作的比较研究,我们能够发现两位学者在诗歌研究上的差异,也能够更加准确地发现宋代诗歌的独特地位和魅力,对宋代诗歌作出更加公允的判断。
In the Ming dynasty, He Jingming said in the "Miscellaneous words ten", "After canon is Sao, after Sao is Fu, after Fu is Poem. Qin hasn't canon, Han hasn't Sao, Tang hasn't Fu, Song hasn't poem". Despite his literature conception on generation change existed "One generation has one generation literature" bud, but some words was toe absolute, prophesy in thoughtless. Through the comparison study of the two works of Mo Lifeng's "Jiangxi theory research" and Ruan Zhong's "Tang and Song poetry geners history", we can discover the two scholars have some differences in poetry research, and we also can find the unique position and charm of Song poetry more accurately in order to give Song dynasty poetry more fair judgment.
出处
《黄冈职业技术学院学报》
2013年第2期45-48,共4页
Journal of Huanggang Polytechnic
关键词
莫砺锋
阮忠
诗歌研究
《江西诗派研究》
《唐宋诗风流别史》
Mo Lifeng
Ruan Zhong
Poetry research
Jiangxi theory research
Tang and Song poetry geners history