期刊文献+

析莫砺锋、阮忠诗歌研究之差异——以《江西诗派研究》《唐宋诗风流别史》的比较为例

Analyze research differences of Mo Lifeng and Ruan Zhong's Poetry——comparison of "Jiangxi poetry study" and "Tang and Song poetry geners history" as an example
下载PDF
导出
摘要 明代何景明曾在《杂言十首》中谓:"经亡而骚作,骚亡而赋作,赋亡而诗作。秦无经,汉无骚,唐无赋,宋无诗。"他的这种"文体代变"的文学观念虽有"一代有一代之文学"的萌芽,却有些过于绝对,言于轻率。对当代学者莫砺锋《江西诗派研究》和阮忠《唐宋诗风流别史》这两部著作的比较研究,我们能够发现两位学者在诗歌研究上的差异,也能够更加准确地发现宋代诗歌的独特地位和魅力,对宋代诗歌作出更加公允的判断。 In the Ming dynasty, He Jingming said in the "Miscellaneous words ten", "After canon is Sao, after Sao is Fu, after Fu is Poem. Qin hasn't canon, Han hasn't Sao, Tang hasn't Fu, Song hasn't poem". Despite his literature conception on generation change existed "One generation has one generation literature" bud, but some words was toe absolute, prophesy in thoughtless. Through the comparison study of the two works of Mo Lifeng's "Jiangxi theory research" and Ruan Zhong's "Tang and Song poetry geners history", we can discover the two scholars have some differences in poetry research, and we also can find the unique position and charm of Song poetry more accurately in order to give Song dynasty poetry more fair judgment.
作者 刘宝强
出处 《黄冈职业技术学院学报》 2013年第2期45-48,共4页 Journal of Huanggang Polytechnic
关键词 莫砺锋 阮忠 诗歌研究 《江西诗派研究》 《唐宋诗风流别史》 Mo Lifeng Ruan Zhong Poetry research Jiangxi theory research Tang and Song poetry geners history
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

  • 1程千帆.古典诗歌描写与结构中的一与多[J].古代文学理论研究丛刊第六辑. 被引量:1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部