期刊文献+

有限处置以平衡维权与维稳——警察处置维权型群体性事件方式的斗鸡博弈分析 被引量:1

Taking Limited Disposal for the Balance of Rights Protection and Dimensional Stability——Analysis of Ways for Police to Dispose Rights Protection Events out of the Perception of Cockfighting Game
下载PDF
导出
摘要 维权型群体性事件是弱势群体为维护切身利益、避免或挽回损失的利益表达方式,正因如此,警察对此类事件的处置方式会对弱势群体的权益维护、警察形象、社会舆论评价等诸多方面产生影响。警察与维权民众的行为互动和斗鸡博弈在逻辑上是相通的,通过斗鸡博弈的原理分析,得出结论:警察对事件强行处置是不可取的,要么民众诉求受到压制,要么暴力冲突升级,警察难以成为最终的胜利者;警察应对事件有限处置,即警察实现与维权民众的合作,在共同利益基础上与民众达成合作共识,寻求维权与维稳的平衡。 Rights protection events are the ways for disadvantaged groups to safeguard their vital interests and avoid being impaired. Police's disposal of such events, therefore, would influence the rights of disadvantaged groups, the image of police and the public evaluation. The logic of the interactions between police and disadvantaged groups is just identical with that of the cockfighting game. It is concluded as follows. Firstly, the forced disposal by police is not desirable, because it leads to demands suppression or escalation of the conflict. Secondly, the limited disposal which reaches cooperation of police and groups on the basis of common interests is the desirable way and achieves the balance of rights protection and dimensional stability.
作者 邢子飞
出处 《公安理论与实践(上海公安高等专科学校学报)》 2013年第2期63-65,共3页 Journal of Shanghai Police College
关键词 维权型群体性事件 斗鸡博弈 强行处置 有限处置 Rights Protection Events Cockfighting Game Forced Disposal Limited Disposal
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1于建嵘.危机与对策--中国社会冲突观察[M].香港:天地图书有限公司,2010. 被引量:1
  • 2谢惠敏.群体性事件处置的策略[M]//郭太生.治安学论丛(第三卷).北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,2006. 被引量:1
  • 3张维迎著..博弈论与信息经济学[M],1996:612.

同被引文献15

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部