摘要
在我国的刑事诉讼中,证人证言是刑事诉讼中普遍使用的一类证据,而证人出庭率低成为影响案件质量和制约庭审功能发挥的瓶颈。2012年《刑事诉讼法》修改时确立了强制证人出庭作证制度。通过对该项制度的理论分析,可以发现我国强制证人出庭作证制度存在证人出庭作证条件较为模糊、法官自由裁量权太大、可以不出庭作证的法定正当理由不够充足、被告人近亲属出庭作证例外存有局限性、对于书面证言作为庭审证据使用的情况缺少限制机制等弊端。为此,应当有针对性地加以完善。
In the criminal lawsuit of our country, the witness testimony is the most widely used evidence in the criminal procedure, but the low rate of witnesses to appear in court becomes the bottleneck restricting the quality of case trial function . The new changes of the procedural law in 2012 established the system of forcing witnesses to appear in court and testify. Based on the theoretical analysis of this system, it can be found that the system has many drawbacks： the conditions for witnesses to appear in court are fuzzy, the judge＇s power of discretionary is too big, the justifications for not appearing in court is not sufficient, the rule indicating that the defendant＇ s close relatives are exceptions for appearing in court has its limitations, and testimony as trial use of evidence lacks restriction mechanism.
出处
《安徽农业大学学报（社会科学版）》
2013年第2期38-42,共5页
Journal of Anhui Agricultural University:SOC.SCI.
关键词
强制证人出庭
立法
弊端
完善
force witnesses to testify in court
legislation
disadvantages
perfection
