摘要
众多学者在论著中把"前七子"的复古作为"台阁体"文学的对立面来看待,把"台阁体"文学的最早代表认定为杨士奇。然而,对明代学者关于"台阁体"文学的主要观点进行一个系统考察后我们发现,明代"台阁体"文学应该起源于宋濂,明代的文学复古也源于明初宋濂等人的"台阁体"文学,只是到何、李时期达到高潮。"台阁体"文学不应作为"前七子"复古的对立,而应看成明代复古文学重要的一部分。合理理解"台阁体"文学以及明代复古运动的历史,我们必须立足于文献,澄清和修正目前学界对于"台阁体"与"前七子"关系认识上的部分偏误,并对"台阁体"进行一些翻案。
Many scholars tend to view the trend of ＇ restoring ancient ways＇ by seven poetic celebrities in the early Ming Dynasty and the ＇Taige- style＇ literature as contradictory to one another, and Yang Shiqi, as purported by them, is identified as the earliest representative of the ＇ Taige -style＇ literature. However, after careful and sys- tematic investigations into majors opinions held by scholars in the Ming Dynasty regarding the ＇ Taige - style＇ litera- ture, it is found that the ＇ Taige - style＇ literature was first initiated by Song Lian, who, together with others, also jointly contributed to the campaign of ＇returning to the ancients＇ Therefore, it is argued that the ＇Taige -style＇ literature should not be treated as a contradiction to the trend of ＇ restoring ancient ways＇ , but rather should be viewed as an important part of it. A correct understanding of the history of the ＇ Taige - style＇ literature and the lit- erary trend of ＇ restoring ancient ways＇ based on scrupulous textual research will help us clarify and revise the mis- understandings that surround the relationship between the ＇ Taige - style＇ literature and the seven poetic celebrities in the early Ming Dynasty.
出处
《南阳师范学院学报》
CAS
2013年第4期27-32,共6页
Journal of Nanyang Normal University
关键词
“台阁体”文学
“前七子”
复古
对立
考论
起源
Taige - style＇ literature
seven poetic celebrities in the early Ming Dynasty
restoring ancient ways
contradiction
textual research
origin
