期刊文献+

一线自体造血干细胞移植治疗多发性骨髓瘤疗效及预后因素分析 被引量:4

Analysis of the efficacy and prognosis on first-line autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation of patients with multiple myeloma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价一线自体造血干细胞移植(ASCT)治疗初诊多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者的疗效,分析其预后相关因素。方法对给予沙利度胺和(或)硼替佐米为基础的诱导化疗并获得部分反应以上疗效的60例初诊MM患者,进行一线ASCT治疗,分析其总生存(OS)和无进展生存(PFS),并探讨国际分期系统(ISS)分期、治疗反应、荧光原位杂交(FISH)检测细胞遗传学异常与患者预后的相关性。结果随访至2012年12月31日,中位随访36.8(12.0~102.5)个月。全组患者预期中位OS和PFS时间分别为未达到和86.5个月。60例患者移植后均获得≥非常好的部分反应(VGPR),其中34例(56.7%)为完全反应(CR)。获得CR者的PFS时间较获得VGPR者长(P=0.030),而3年预期0s率差异无统计学意义(P=0.942)。ISS分期不影响患者的PFS时间(P=0.445)和OS率(P=0.467)。单因素分析显示IgH重排、p53缺失、13q14缺失和1q21扩增等细胞遗传学异常均为与患者生存相关的不良预后因素。去除合并t(4;14)/t(14;16)或p53缺失患者,13q14缺失及1q21扩增与PFS和0s均无相关性。t(4;14)影响患者的PFS而非0s。p53缺失的患者预后差,特别是合并其他细胞遗传学异常者,中位PFS和OS时间分别仅17和31个月。结论新药联合一线ASCT治疗初诊MM患者,可获得高质量的治疗反应,延长患者的PFS和OS时间。细胞遗传学异常和治疗反应是影响患者生存的主要因素。 Objective To explore the efficacy and prognosis of first-line autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma ( MM ). Methods From January 2005 to December 31, 2012, 60 patients with MM were enrolled. All patients received thalido mide or/and bortezomib-based induction therapy, then received high-dose melphalan (200 mg/m2) and autologous stem cell support to get a〉 partial response (PR) , and followed by thalidomide-dexamethasone (TD) + bortezomib as consolidation or maintenance treatment. With the follow up to December 31, 2012, the overall survival (OS) , progression free survival (PFS) and the prognostic factors, including ISS stage, response and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) data of cytogenetics were analyzed. Results With a median follow up of 36.8 ( 12.0 - 102.5 ) months, the median OS and PFS estimate were not reached and 86.5 months, respectively. After transplantation, all ( 100% ) patients received very good partial response (VGPR), and 34 (56.7%) patients achieved complete response (CR) after consolidation or maintenance treatment. The patients that achieved CR resulted in long term PFS (P = 0. 030), with no difference in OS (P = 0.942). The univariate analysis showed that the abnormalities, including ! 3 q14 deletion, 1 q21 gain, IgH location and p53 deletion had the prognostic impacts. If the t(4;14) or p53 deletion was excluded, there would be no correlation between 13q14 deletion or 1 q21 gain with PFS and OS. The patients with p53 deletion had a worst survival. Conclusion There has been significant improvement in the outcome for young MM patients by using ASCT and novel drugs. Cytogenetic abnormalities and response to therapy are the mainfactors affecting the survival of patients.
出处 《中华血液学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第4期299-303,共5页 Chinese Journal of Hematology
基金 天津市科技计划项目(12ZCDZSY17600,09ZCZDSF03800) 国家自然科学基金(81172255) 卫生部部属(管)医院临床学科重点项目(2010-2012) 科技部国际合作重点项目(2010DFB30270)
关键词 多发性骨髓瘤 造血干细胞移植 存活率分析 预后 Multiple myeloma Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation Survival Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Harousseau JL, Attal M, Avet-Loiseau H, et al. Bortezomib plus dexamethasone is superior to vincristine plus doxorubicin plus dex- amethasone as induction treatment prior to autologous stem-cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma : results of the IFM 2005-01 phase llI trial. J Clin Oncol, 2010, 28:4621-4629. 被引量:1
  • 2Cavo M, Tacchetti P, Patriarca F, et al. Bortezomib with thalido- mide plus dexamethasone compared with thalidomide plus dexam- ethasone as induction therapy before, and consolidation therapy af-ter, double autologous stem-cell transplantation in newly diag- nosedmultiple myeloma: a randomised phase 3 study. Lancet, 2010, 376:2075-2085. 被引量:1
  • 3Rosifiol L, Oriol A, Teruel AI, et al. Superiority of bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (VTD) as induction pretrans- plantation therapy in multiple myeloma: a randomized phase 3 PETHEMA/GEM study. Blood, 2012,120 : 1589-1596. 被引量:1
  • 4International Myeloma Working Group. Criteria for the classifica- tion of monoclonal gammopathies, multiple myeloma and related disorders: a report of the International Myeloma Working Group. Br J Haematol, 2003,121:749-57. 被引量:1
  • 5Greipp PR, San Miguel J, Durie BG, et al. International staging system for multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol, 2005, 23: 3412- 3420. 被引量:1
  • 6Durie BG, Harousseau JL, Miguel JS, et al. International uniform response criteria for multiple myeloma. Leukemia, 2006, 20 : 1467-1473. 被引量:1
  • 7邓书会,徐燕,麦玉洁,王亚非,赵耀中,邹德慧,邱录贵.112例多发性骨髓瘤患者ISS分期分析及与DS分期、IFM分期的比较[J].中华血液学杂志,2008,29(4):217-221. 被引量:11
  • 8Martinez-Lopez J, Blade J, Mateos MV, et aL Long-term prognos- tic significance of response in multiple myeloma after stem cell transplantation. Blood, 2011, 118:529-534. 被引量:1
  • 9Moreau P, Attal M, P6gouri6 B, et al. Achievement of VGPR to induction therapy is an important prognostic factor for longer PFS in the IFM 2005-01 trial. Blood, 2011,117:3041-3044. 被引量:1
  • 10Ladetto M, Pagliano G, Ferrero S, et al. Major tumor shrinking and persistent molecular remissions after consolidation with borte- zomib, thalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with autograf- ted myeloma. J Clin Oncol, 2010, 28:2077-2084. 被引量:1

二级参考文献19

  • 1麦玉洁,邱录贵,李睿,靳风艳,白洁,万长春,王建祥,季林祥,肖志坚,钱林生.432例多发性骨髓瘤临床分析[J].白血病.淋巴瘤,2004,13(4):198-201. 被引量:27
  • 2李睿,张莉,徐泽锋,高辉,聂能,肖志坚.沙利度胺加联合化疗治疗恶性浆细胞疾病的疗效和不良反应[J].白血病.淋巴瘤,2006,15(1):16-19. 被引量:10
  • 3陶中飞,傅卫军,陈玉宝,袁振刚,王东星,侯健.206例多发性骨髓瘤预后因素分析及分期评价[J].癌症,2006,25(4):461-464. 被引量:44
  • 4Greipp PR, Miguel JS, Durie BG, et al. International staging system for multiple myeloma. J Clin Oneol, 2005, 23:3412-3420. 被引量:1
  • 5Sagaster V, Kaufmann H, Odelga V, et al. Chromosomal abnormalities of young multiple myeloma patients ( <45 yr) are not different from those of other age groups and are independent of stage according to the International Staging System. Eur J Haematol, 2007, 78:227-234 被引量:1
  • 6Augustson BM, Begum G, Dunn JA, et al. Early mortality after diagnosis of multiple myeloma : analysis of patients entered onto the United Kingdom Medical Research Council trials between 1980 and 2002 Medical Research Council Adult Leukaemia Working Party. J Clin Oncol, 2005, 23:9219-9226. 被引量:1
  • 7Knudsen LM, Hjorth M, Hippe E. Renal failure in multiple myeloma: reversibility and impact on the prognosis. Nordic Myeloma Study Group. Eur J Haematol, 2000, 65: 175-181. 被引量:1
  • 8Drayson M, Begum G,Basu S, et al. Effect of paraprotein heavy and light chain type and free light chain load on survival in myeloma : an analysis of patients receiving conventional-dose chemotherapy in Medical Research Council UK multiple myeloma trials. Blood, 2006, 108:2013-2019, 被引量:1
  • 9Facon T, Avet-Loiseau H, Guillerm G, et al. Chromosome 13 abnormalities identified by FISH analysis and serum beta2-mieroglobulin produce a powerful myeloma staging system for patients receiving high dose therapy. Blood, 2001, 97:1566-1571. 被引量:1
  • 10Myeloma Trialists'Collaborative Group.Combination chemotherapy versus melphalan plus prednisone as treatment for multiple myeloma:an overview of 6633 patients from 27 randomized trials[J].J Clin Oncol,1998,16(12):3832~3842 被引量:1

共引文献11

同被引文献14

  • 1Kyle R.A, Rajkumar SV. Criteria for diagnosis, staging, risk stratifi- cation mad response assessment of multiple myeloma[J]. Leukemia, 2009, 23(1):3-9. 被引量:1
  • 2Martinez-Lopez J, Blade J, Mateos MV, et al.Long-term prognos- tic significance of response in multiple myeloma after stem cell trans- plantation[J]. Blood, 2011, 118(3):529-534. 被引量:1
  • 3Moreau P, Attal M, Pgouri B, et al. Achievement of VGPR to in- duction therapy is an important prognostic factor for longer PFS in the IFM 2005-01trial[J]. Blood, 2011, 117(11):3041-3044. 被引量:1
  • 4Ladetto M, Pagliano G, Ferrero S, et al. Major tumor shrinking and persistent molecular remissions after consolidation with bortezo- mib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone in patients with autografted myelomaU].J Clin Oncol, 2010, 28(12):2077-2084. 被引量:1
  • 5Cavo M, Rajkumar SV, Palumbo A, et al. International Myeloma Working Group consensus approach to the treatment of multiple myeloma patients who arecandidates for autologous stem cell trans- plantationS. Blood, 2011, 117(23):6063-6073. 被引量:1
  • 6Oakervee H, Popat R, Cavenagh JD. Use of bortezomib as induc- tion therapy prior to stem cell transplantation in frontline treatment of multiple myeloma: impact on stem cell harvesting and engraft- ment[l]. Leuk Lymphoma, 2007, 48(10):1910-1921. 被引量:1
  • 7Sormeveld P, Schmidt-Wolf I(3, van der Holt B, et al. Bortezomib induction and maintenance treatment in padents with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: results of the randomized phase Ill HOVON-65/ GMMG-HD4 trial[l].J Clin Oncol, 2012, 30(24):2946-2955. 被引量:1
  • 8Cavo M, Tacchetti P, Patriarca F, et al. Bortezomib with thalido- mide Plus dexamethasone compared with thalidomide plus dexa- methasone as inducfiontherapy before, and consolidation therapy after, double Autologous stem-ceU trarvsplantation in newly diag- nosed multiple myeloma: a randomised phase 3 study[J]. Lancet, 2010, 376(9758):2075-2085. 被引量:1
  • 9Harousseau JL, Attal M, Avet-Loiseau H, et al. Bortezomib plus Dexamethasone is superior to vincristine plus doxorubicin plus dexamethasone as induction treatment prior to autologous stem-ceU transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: re- suits of the IFM 2005-01 phase m trial[J].J Clin Oncol, 2010, 28 (30) :4621-4629. 被引量:1
  • 10刘辉,常乃柏,李江涛,宁尚勇,裴蕾,程玮,田园.自体外周造血干细胞移植治疗21例多发性骨髓瘤的临床疗效及预后因素评价[J].临床血液学杂志,2011,24(2):145-147. 被引量:3

引证文献4

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部