摘要
我国目前的学术评价机制已步入重形式轻内容、重数量轻质量的误区。更为严重的是,期刊评价的结果被异化为学术评价的主要标准。这一现象在客观上违背了学术发展的规律,加剧了学术生态的恶化。应当倡导科学的评价理念,改变本末倒置的做法,从政策源头上,制定多元化的分类评价标准;引入"代表作"制度,强化定性评价;逐步取消量化考核指标,以文献计量评价为补充,引导"核心期刊"功能的回归。
There is a misunderstanding,stressing form at the expense of contentand putting quantity ahead of quality,merging in Chinese academic evaluation mechanism recently.More seriously,the results of journal evaluation been regarded as the primary criterions of academic evaluation.This phenomenon breaks the objective rules of academic development and lead to the deterioration of academic ecology.This paper advocatesscientific evaluation idea in order to avoid putting the cart before the horse.Specifically,this paper suggests to set multiple evaluation standard,establish ＂master works＂ system,strengthen qualitative evaluation,cancel the quantification assessment indicators gradually,and ensure the true function of ＂core journal＂ based on the complement from bibliometric evaluation.
出处
《图书与情报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第1期84-89,共6页
Library & Information
关键词
学术评价
期刊评价
功能异化
代表作制度
academic evaluation
journal evaluation
functional alienation
u＂master works＂ system
