摘要
未遂犯之能与不能的"二分法"是我国刑法理论之通说,且认为不能犯未遂具有可罚性。严格地说,不能犯当作广义与狭义的区分,即可罚的不能犯与不可罚的不能犯之区别。二者界分的关键,在于对未遂犯与不可罚不能犯之行为危险的判断。对此,学界争论较为激烈,学说派别林立,但比较而言,采兼顾行为时一般人标准与行为人特别认识之事实的"具体危险说"判断立场是可取的。
Due to the general criminal theories in China, the attempted offense should be divided into the capability and incapability ones. Usually, the incapability and not realizing in committing-crime is considered to be punishable. Strictly speaking, impossibility offense has the broad and narrow difference, in other words, it＇s different in the punishable and the unpunisbable. And the key distinction between them is how to judge the danger. On this issue, there are heated debates between different scholars and therefore it has a lot of academic viewpoints. But after comparing, the theory which takes both the common people＇s standard and the standard of the behavior person special knowledge of facts is admissible.
出处
《成都理工大学学报（社会科学版）》
2013年第2期43-50,共8页
Journal of Chengdu University of Technology:Social Sciences
关键词
不能未遂犯
可罚性
危险性
the incapability and not realizing in committing-crimes the punishable
the dangerous
