摘要
目的研究玉龙散与活血散对缓解骨科慢性疼痛的不同效果。方法将305例住院骨科慢性疼痛患者按抽签法随机分为3组,对照组99例采用常规治疗和护理方法,活血散组100例在常规基础上加活血散煮敷,玉龙散组106例在常规基础上加玉龙散煮敷;比较3组患者用药前、用药3 d及7 d后解除膏药1 h内疼痛程度。结果3组患者用药前与用药3 d及7 d后组内及组间疼痛比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.001);用药3 d后对照组与活血散比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),而对照组与玉龙散组及活血散组与玉龙散组差异均有统计学意义(P<0.001);用药7 d后对照组与活血散组、对照组与玉龙散组及活血散组与玉龙散组间比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.001)。结论玉龙散与活血散均有助于缓解骨科慢性疼痛,但玉龙散起效更快,效果更显著。
Objective To study different effects of Yu Long San （YELL） and Huo Xue San （HXS） on orthopedic chronic pain. Methods Totally 305 hospitalized orthopedic patients with chronic pain were randomly divided into control group, in which 99 cases received conventional treatment and nursing, YES Group, in which YLS and conventional treatment and nursing were applied and the HXS Group, in which HXS and conventional treatment and nursing were applied. The Numerical Rating Scale （NRS） was applied to assess the differences in degree of pain among three groups before the treatment, the 3rd of treatment and the 7th day of the treatment. Results There were statistically significant differences in degree of pain at 3 different time points among three groups （P〈 0.001）. Conclusion Both YLS and HXS can help relieve orthopedic chronic pain, but the effect of YLS is more significant.
出处
《护理学报》
2013年第6期56-58,共3页
Journal of Nursing（China）
基金
佛山市医学科学技术研究计划项目(2012136)
关键词
骨科慢性疼痛
玉龙散
活血散
orthopedics chronic pain
Yu Long San
Huo Xue San
