摘要
目的观察不同针刺频次治疗血管性轻度认知障碍的临床疗效。方法将32例血管性轻度认知障碍患者根据自身意愿分为治疗组16例和对照组16例。两组均采用针刺治疗,治疗组每星期治疗3次,对照组每星期治疗2次。治疗10星期后比较两组临床疗效及MoCA量表变化。结果两组治疗后MoCA得分与同组治疗前比较,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。治疗组总有效率为64.3%,对照组为50.0%,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗组治疗后MoCA评分与对照组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组治疗后MoCA量表中注意力和计算力、语言、延迟记忆和定向能力等因子评分与同组治疗前比较,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论针刺干预血管性轻度认知障碍有确切的近期疗效,每星期治疗2次与每星期治疗3次的针刺疗效无显著差异。
Objective To observe the clinical efficacy on acupuncture of diverse frequencies in treating mild vascular cognitive impairment （MVCI）. Method Thirty-two patients with MVCI were divided into a treatment group of 16 cases and a control group of 16 cases according to patients＇ own wills. The two groups both received acupuncture treatment, 3 times a week in the treatment group and 2 times a week in the control group. Clinical efficacies and changes of Montreal Cognitive Assessment （MoCA） score were compared after 10-week treatment. Result The two groups both had marked changes in MoCA score after treatment （P〈 0.01）. The total effective rate was 64.3% in the treatment group versus 50.0% in the control group, and the difference was statistically insignificant （P〉0.05）. In comparing MoCA score after treatment, the difference between the treatment group and the control group was statistically insignificant （P〉0.05）. Both groups had marked changes in terms of attention and calculation, language, delayed memory, and visuospatial abilities in MoCA after treatment （P〈0.01）. Conclusion Acupuncture intervention has accurate short-term therapeutic efficacy for MVCI, and the two treatment frequencies, twice a week and three times a week, don＇t make significant difference in treatment effect.
出处
《上海针灸杂志》
2013年第3期175-177,共3页
Shanghai Journal of Acupuncture and Moxibustion
基金
首都医学发展基金资助项目(SF-2009-16)
关键词
针刺疗法
认知障碍
电针
针刺频次
Acupuncture therapy
Cognitive impairment
Electroacupuncmre
Acupuncture frequency
