摘要
20世纪三四十年代,日本的侵略使中国面临近代以来最为严重的存亡危机,以爱国主义为主流的民族主义高涨。受此影响,中日两国在学术上也呈对抗之势,表现在从"九一八"至抗战前,以傅斯年、顾颉刚为代表的大批知识分子转而从事边疆学术研究,以反驳日本学者的"中国边疆史地"研究,以期唤醒国人、政府的边疆意识和救国责任。抗战期间,东部大批高校、研究机构及知识分子等西迁,使中国边疆,不仅成为知识分子抒发爱国情怀的场域,也成为他们运用西方社会科学理论与方法构建本土化的边疆学术研究的场域。
During the 1930s and 1940s, China laced tile most threat to its survival in modem times and a crisis serious internal crisis because of the Japanese invasion, while nationalism was surging. In academic, the two countries also faced off in a potential confrontation. Between the Manchurian incidents, also known as ＂9.18＂ for September 18, 1931, to the Anti-Japanese War, a large number of intellectuals, such as Fu Sinian and Gu Jiegang as represenlatives of China, were engaged in Chinese frontier research designed to refute Japanese scholar＇s ＂China＇s borderland history and geography studies＂, in an effort to stir up tile Chinese people and governalent＇s national border consciousness and stimulate their responsibility of save the nation from foreign invasion. During the war of resistance, a large number of eastern universities, research institutions and intellectuals were moved westward. Discussion of the Chinese frontier by intellectuals became a common field of intellectuals which not only manifested their patriotic feelings, but also used western social science theories and methods to develop a concept of the Chinese localization frontier in the field of academic research.
