摘要
限缩法官的裁量权,增加当事人的主体地位及程序权利的价值取向并没有在新民事诉讼法形成统一性以及连贯性。新法赋予当事人简易程序选择权也没有经过严密的立法论证,同时由于该制度设计存在缺陷及审判质量很低等因素必然造成虚置,仅起宣示作用。建立自己责任原则,完善法官的阐明义务,采取不同的收费制度等相关制度,才能使当事人真正拥有简易程序选择权。
Limiting the judge＇s discretion and increasing the dominant position of the party and the value orientation of the pro- cedural rights have not formed the unity and coherence in the new Civil Procedure Law. The new law has given the parties tight to choose summary procedure with- out strict legislative argument, and at the same time, due to the defects of the system design, the low trial quality and other fac- tors, the system will be inevitably dummy only with the proclaimed role. Building the principle of their own responsibility, per- fecting the clarifying obligations of judges and taking a different fee system can really give the parties rights to choose summary procedure.
出处
《辽宁公安司法管理干部学院学报》
2013年第1期13-15,共3页
Journal of Liaoning Administrators College of Police and Justice
关键词
简易程序选择权
宣示作用
审判质量
制度设计
程序转换
right to choose surmnary proce- dure
proclaimed role
trial quality
system design
program conversion
