期刊文献+

美国数学教师学科知识评价方法的述评 被引量:19

Review on the Assessment Methods on Mathematics Teacher’s Subject Matter Knowledge in America
下载PDF
导出
摘要 美国关于数学教师学科知识评价的研究已经形成了多种方法,主要有课堂或录像的观察,数学任务的访谈,以及标准化的测量.尽管研究者对数学教师学科知识的研究已经得到了发展,但尚未达成共识.SIULMT认为学科知识包含3类:一般的学科知识、专门的学科知识和横向的数学知识.DTAMS中所界定的学科知识就是教师所教的数学知识,这些数学知识分为3类:记忆性的事实和技能,概念性的理解,高水平的思维.KAT把学科知识分成两类:中学代数知识,高于中学数学课程的高等数学知识.Scaling Up SimCalc没有对数学教师的学科知识进行明确的划分. The assessment studies on mathematics teachers' subject matter knowledge have developed a variety of methods in America, involving classroom observation, interview based on mathematics task, and standard assessment. American researchers have developed their understanding of subject matter knowledge for mathematics teaching though they have not reached common ground. However, no method is perfect. In other words, the synthesis of various methods to assess teacher's knowledge is the best option.
出处 《数学教育学报》 北大核心 2013年第1期55-60,共6页 Journal of Mathematics Education
基金 江苏省高等教育改革立项研究课题——数学教育类课程“四位一体”教学模式的研究与实践(2011JSJG103)
关键词 数学教师 学科知识 评价方法 mathematics teacher subject matter knowledge assessment methods
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Shulman L S. Those Who Understand:Knowledge Growth in Teaching[J].Educational Researcher,1986,(15):4-14. 被引量:1
  • 2Greenwald R,Hedges L V,Laine R D. The Effect of School Resources on Student Achievement[J].Review of Educational Research,1996,(06):361-396. 被引量:1
  • 3Hill H C,Sleep L,Lewis J M. Assessing Teachers' Mathematical Knowledge:What Knowledge Matters and What Evidence Counts[A].Charlotte,NC:Information Age Publishing,2007. 被引量:1
  • 4Strauss R P,Sawyer E A. Some New Evidence on Teacher and Student Competencies[J].Economics of Education Review,1986,(05):41-48. 被引量:1
  • 5Mullens J E,Murnane R J,Willett J B. The Contribution of Training and Subject Matter Knowledge to Teaching Effectiveness:a Multilevel Analysis of Longitudinal Evidence from Belize[J].Comparative Education Review,1996,(40):139-157. 被引量:1
  • 6Leinhardt G,Smith D A. Expertise in Mathematics Instruction:Subject Matter Knowledge[J].Journal of Educational Psychology,1985,(77):247-271. 被引量:1
  • 7Borko H,Eisenhart M,Brown C A. Learning to Teach hard Mathematics:Do Novice Teachers and Their Instructors Give up Too Easily[J].Journal For Research in Mathematics Education,1992,(23):194-222. 被引量:1
  • 8Speer N F,Wagner J F. Knowledge Needed by a Teacher to Provide Analytic Scaffolding During Undergraduate Mathematics Classroom Discussions[J].Journal For Research in Mathematics Education,2009,(40):530-562. 被引量:1
  • 9Sawada D,Pilburn M. Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol[M].2000. 被引量:1
  • 10Horizon Research. Inside the Classroom Observation and Analytic Protocol[M].2000. 被引量:1

同被引文献226

引证文献19

二级引证文献125

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部