期刊文献+

多元化与归核化决策的自选择特征及对公司价值的影响——基于中国上市公司的研究 被引量:7

The Self-selection of Diversifying and Refocusing Decisions and Their Value Effects:An Empirical Study on Listed Companies in China
原文传递
导出
摘要 公司基于自身特点选择多元化或归核化经营。本文从动态视角出发,以2006—2010年经历多元化与归核化的A股上市公司为研究对象,发现多元化决策与归核化决策都具有自选择特征,选择所依据的因素往往有市场评价、经营业绩、投资机会等。市场估值较低、业绩较差、上市时间较长的公司意图通过进入新的行业寻找新的投资机会;但现实中多元化决策并未有效提高公司价值,公司利润反而相对专业化公司不断下滑,造成公司价值的进一步折损。与此相对应的是,归核化公司在回归主业之前的市场估值相对较高,其中部分企业迫于资金压力选择出售非核心业务,通过减少经营类别而专注于核心业务。归核化后的公司利润率提高,公司价值得以明显提升。 Viewing diversification as a dynamic process will help us to understand its mechanism and value effect.Using data from listed companies in China's Mainland during 2006 to 2010,we find that diversifying and refocusing decisions are endogenous.Specifically,companies with lower excess value,lower return and older age are more inclined to diversify,with the purpose of searching for new investment opportunities;meanwhile,companies with higher excess value are more inclined to sell their peripheral segments,compared with those keep operating in more than one industry.By analyzing the value change through diversifying processes we can't conclude that diversification destroys value;however,we do find value destruction effect as the diversification operation continues.On the other hand,refocusing decision can improve company value significantly.
作者 王辉 孔爱国
出处 《复旦学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第1期18-28,154-155,共11页 Fudan Journal(Social Sciences)
关键词 多元化 归核化 自选择 价值变化 diversifying refocusing self-selection value change
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Matsasuka J. G., " Corporate Diversification, Value Maximization and Organizational Capabilities," Journal of Business 74 (2001) : 409 -431. 被引量:1
  • 2L. Lang, and R. Stulz, "Tobin's q, Corporate Diversification, and Firm Performance," Journal of Political Economy 102 (1994) : 1248 - 1280. 被引量:1
  • 3P. Berger, and E. Ofek, "Diversification's Effect on Finn Value," Journal of Financial Economics 37 (1995) : 39 -66. 被引量:1
  • 4V. Maksimovic, G. Phillips, " Does Conglomerate Firms Allocate Resources Inefficiently Across Industries? Theory and Evi- dence," Jounal of Finance 57 (2002) : 721 - 767. 被引量:1
  • 5R. Borghesi, J. Houston, and A. Naranjo, "Value, Survival, and the Evolution of Firm Organizational Structure," Financial Management 36 (2007) : 5 - 31. 被引量:1
  • 6J.D. Hund, and S. Monk, "Tice, Uncertainty about Average Profitability and the Diversification Discount," Journal of Financial Economics 96 (2010) : 463 -484. 被引量:1
  • 7J. M. Campa, and S. Kedia,— "Explaining the Diversification Discount," Journal of Finance 52 (2002) : 1731 - 1762. 被引量:1
  • 8L. Laeven, and R. Levine, "Is There a Diversification Discount in Financial Conglomerates," Journal of Financial Economics 85 (2007) : 331 -367. 被引量:1
  • 9G. Cloak, and T. M. Whited, "Spin-offs, Divestitures, and Conglomerate Investment," 20 (2007): 557-595. 被引量:1
  • 10Dittmar, and Shivdasani, "Divestitures and Divisional Investment Policies," The Journal of Finance 58 (2003) : 2711 - 274—. 被引量:1

二级参考文献24

共引文献197

同被引文献119

引证文献7

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部