期刊文献+

漓江流域土地利用生态风险评价 被引量:6

Ecological Risk Assessment of Land Use in Lijiang River Basin
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文以漓江各子流域作为基本评价单元,在土地利用的基础上,利用构建的多风险源、多受体、多风险效应因子的区域综合生态风险评价模型对漓江流域进行土地利用生态风险评价,结果表明:①高生态风险区主要集中分布在人口密集、工业集中的桂林市主城区周边的各子流域,这些流域内的风险源强,受体暴露度和生态风险效应的值均比较高,区域人类活动是区域生态风险加剧和蔓延的主要影响因素;②低生态风险区主要集中在流域上游溶江周边,这些子流域内的植被覆盖度和水面率都比较高,而人类活动干扰相对较弱,应加强土地资源的合理有效利用和生态环境保护,在防止生态环境进一步恶化的同时有效改善当前环境状况;③生态风险总体水平较低,其中较低生态风险区占44.09%,流域总体可降低生态风险潜力很大。 This paper,based on land use,and taking sub-basin of Lijiang river as evolution unit,uses an integrated regional ecological risk assessment model which contain multiple risk source ,multiple receptors and multiple risk effect to evaluate the ecological risk of Lijiang river basin. The results showed that.l) high-risk areas are mainly distributed along Lijiang river around central Guilin city,where there is a concentration of population and industries. The strength of risk sources and the exposure degree of risk receptor,as well as the risk effect of these sub-basins are all in a highvalue. Human activities are the main causes affecting the ecological risk increasing and diffusion. 2) Low risk areas are those sub-basins around Rongjiang river in the upstream where there are high vegetation coverage and surface water ratio with little human impact. In these regions,the land resources should be reasonablly and effectively used, and the ecological environment protection should be reinforced. 3) General ecological risk of the area is low and the proportion of sub-basin with lower ecological risk is up to 44.09%,which suggests the potentiality of reducing ecological risk in the studied area is great.
出处 《广西师范大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS 北大核心 2012年第4期172-178,共7页 Journal of Guangxi Normal University:Natural Science Edition
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(40971280 30870345) 中央分成水资源费资助项目(2010-2011)
关键词 生态风险评价 漓江流域 土地利用 空间分异 ecological risk assessment Lijiang river basin land use spatial differentiation
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1韩丽,曾添文.生态风险评价的方法与管理简介[J].重庆环境科学,2001,23(3):21-23. 被引量:18
  • 2毛小苓,倪晋仁.生态风险评价研究述评[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),2005,41(4):646-654. 被引量:127
  • 3臧淑英,梁欣,张思冲.基于GIS的大庆市土地利用生态风险分析[J].自然灾害学报,2005,14(4):141-145. 被引量:107
  • 4DOMENE X,RAMIREZ W,MATTANA S,et al. Ecological risk assessment of organic waste amendments using the species sensitivity distribution from a soil organisms test battery[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2008,155 (2) : 227-236. 被引量:1
  • 5ZHOU Shi-jie,GRIFFITHS S P. Sustainability assessment for fishing effects (SAFE):A new quantitative ecological risk assessment method and its application to elasmo branch by catch in an Australian trawl fishery[J]. Fisheries Re- search, 2008,91 (1) : 56-68. 被引量:1
  • 6CRITTO A ,TORRESAN S,SEMENZIN E,et al. Marcom in i A[J]. Development Science of the Total Environment, 2007,379(1) :16-33. 被引量:1
  • 7USEPA. Waquoit bay watershed ecological risk assessment :the effect of land-derived Nitrogen loads on estuarine eu- trophication, 600/R-O2/O791-R1. Washington : Environmental Protection Agency, 2002. 被引量:1
  • 8VICTOR B. Applying ecological risk principles to watershed assessment and management[J]. Environmental Manage- ment ,2002,29(2) : 145-154. 被引量:1
  • 9OBERY A M,LANDIS W G. A regional multiple stressor risk assessment of the codorus creek watershed applying the relative risk model[J].Human and Ecological Risk Assessment ,2002,8(2):405-428. 被引量:1
  • 10HAYES E H,LANDIS W G. Regional ecological risk assessment of a near shore marine environment :Cherry Point, WA[J]. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 2004,10(2) : 299-325. 被引量:1

二级参考文献93

共引文献2954

同被引文献98

  • 1俞孔坚.景观生态战略点识别方法与理论地理学的表面模型[J].地理学报,1998,53(B12):11-18. 被引量:136
  • 2郭丽英,刘彦随,任志远.生态脆弱区土地利用格局变化及其驱动机制分析——以陕西榆林市为例[J].资源科学,2005,27(2):128-133. 被引量:83
  • 3毛小苓,倪晋仁.生态风险评价研究述评[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),2005,41(4):646-654. 被引量:127
  • 4Office of Water. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. Guidelines for ecological risk assessment[M]. Washington D C,USA:Office of Water, 1998. 被引量:1
  • 5Cormier S M, Smith M, Norton S, et al. Assessing ecological risk in watersheds:a case study of problem formulation in the Big Darby Creek Watershed, Ohio, USA [J]. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2000,19 (4) : 1082- 1096. 被引量:1
  • 6Barnthouse L W, Suter G W, Rosen A E. Inferring population- level significance from individual-level effects; An extrapola- tion from fisheries science to ecotoxicology[M]//Suter G W II, Lewis M A. Aquatic Toxicology and Environmental Fates:11 Volume. ASTM STP 1007. PA, USA: American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 1998 : 289- 300. 被引量:1
  • 7Cook R B,Suter G W,Sain E R. Ecological risk assessment in a large river reservoir: 1. Introduction and back-ground[J]. Environmental Toxicology Chemistry, 1999,18 (4) : 581 - 588. 被引量:1
  • 8Suter G W II, Barnthouse L W, Efroymson R A, et al. Ecologi- cal risk assessment in a large river-reservoir: 2. Introduction and background[J]. Environmental Toxicology Chemistry, 1999,18(4): 589-598. 被引量:1
  • 9Jones D S, Barnthouse L W, Suter GW II, et al. Ecological risk assessment in a large river-reservoir: 3. Introduction and background[J]. Environmental Toxicology Chemistry, 1999, 18(4) : 599-609. 被引量:1
  • 10Sample B E,Suter G W. Ecological risk assessment in a large river-reservoir: 4. Introduction andbackground[J]. Environ- mental Toxicology Chemistry,1999,18(4) :610-620. 被引量:1

引证文献6

二级引证文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部