期刊文献+

非均质与各向异性黏土基坑抗隆起稳定分析 被引量:9

Analysis for basal stability of braced excavation in nonhomogeneous and anisotropic clay
下载PDF
导出
摘要 经典的Prandtl机构不能很好地反映支护结构入土深度的影响,也不能反映土体强度非均质和各向异性的影响。根据塑性极限分析上限定理,基于修正的Prandtl机构,推导了既可以合理反映支护结构入土深度影响,又可以反映土体强度非均质和各向异性特性的基坑抗隆起稳定的上限解公式,同时基于商业化程序的二次开发,建立了可以考虑土体强度非均质和各向异性影响的强度折减弹塑性有限元方法。通过提出的修正Prandtl机构上限解与强度折减有限元方法以及多块体上限解的对比,验证了修正机构上限解以及强度折减有限元法的合理性和可行性,最后讨论了非均质系数、各向异性系数、支护机构入土深度等因素对基坑抗隆起稳定性的影响,并通过了实例的验证,相关结论可供工程参考。 The classical Prandtl mechanism could not reflect the effects of inserted depth of wall penetration well and has limitation to reflect the effects of the nonhomogeneity and anisotropy of the clay.An improved analytical formula based on a modified Prandtl mechanism is given,which obeys the upper bound theorem of plastic limit analysis.This formula could reflect the effects of inserted depth of wall penetration well,and the effects of the nonhomogeneity and anisotropy of the clay could also be considered.In the meantime,considering the effects of the nonhomogeneity and anisotropy of the clay,a shear strength reduction finite element method(SSRFEM) is developed through the secondary development of commercialized software.The reasonability and reliability of the proposed modified mechanism and SSRFEM are verified by compared with the multi-block upper bound method.And the formula which is verified by a case study can give proper safety factors considering the influence of inserted depth of wall penetration,nonhomogeneity and anisotropy.Related conclusions can bring references for excavation designs.
出处 《岩土力学》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第2期455-461,467,共8页 Rock and Soil Mechanics
基金 国家杰出青年科学基金项目(No.50825803) 上海市优秀学科带头人计划项目(No.09XD1403900)
关键词 非均质 各向异性 强度折减有限单元法 修正Prandtl机构 极限分析上限解 nonhomogeneity anisotropy shear strength reduction finite element method modified Prandtl mechanism upper bound limit analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

二级参考文献59

  • 1邹广电.基于一个上限分析方法的深基坑抗隆起稳定分析[J].岩土力学,2004,25(12):1873-1878. 被引量:25
  • 2魏星,黄茂松.黏土的各向异性边界面模型[J].水利学报,2006,37(7):831-837. 被引量:16
  • 3TERZAGHI K. Theoretical soil mechanics[M]. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1943. 被引量:1
  • 4BJERRUM L, EIDE O. Stability of strutted excavations in clay[J]. Geotechnique, 1956, 6(1): 115-128. 被引量:1
  • 5CAI F, UGAI K, HAGIWARA T. Base stability of circular excavation in soft clay[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2002, 128(8): 702-706. 被引量:1
  • 6FAHEEM H, CAI F, UGAI K. Two-dimensional base stability of excavations in soft soils using FEM[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2003, 30(2): 141 - 163. 被引量:1
  • 7FAHEEM H, CAI F, UGAI K. Three-dimensional base stability of rectangular excavations in soft soils using FEM[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2004, 31(2): 67-74. 被引量:1
  • 8SMITH I M, HOD K H. Influence of construction technique on the performance of a braced excavation in marine clay[J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics 1992, 16(12): 845-868. 被引量:1
  • 9GOH A T C. Assessment of basal heave stability for braced excavation systems using the finite element method[J]. Computers and Geotechnics 1990, 10(4): 325-338. 被引量:1
  • 10GOH A T C. Estimating basal-heave stability for braced excavations in soft clay[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1994, 120(8): 1 430- 1436. 被引量:1

共引文献119

同被引文献99

引证文献9

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部