期刊文献+

后腹腔镜技术治疗复杂性输尿管上段结石临床分析 被引量:12

Clinical singnificance of retroperitoneal laparoscopy for the complex proximal ureteral calculi
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨后腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术治疗复杂性输尿管上段结石的适应证选择及手术技巧。方法:回顾性分析2009年3月~2011年12月术前确诊为复杂性输尿管上段结石并行后腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术29例患者的临床资料。结果:29例手术均获得成功,手术时间60~180min,平均98.6min;术中出血20~50ml,平均35ml。术后无严重并发症发生。随访2~34个月,患者肾输尿管积水均明显好转,无结石复发和输尿管吻合处狭窄等并发症。结论:后腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术安全有效,可以作为体积较大、位置较低或经其他微创治疗失败的复杂性输尿管上段结石首选的治疗方法。 Objective: To evaluate the selection of indications and surgical techniques of retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithotomy in complex proximal ureteral calculi. Method:The clinical data of 29 patients, from March 2009 to December 2011, who underwent retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for the complex proximal ureteral stones were retrospectively analyzed. Result: All the 29 cases underwent retroperitoneoseopic ureterolithotomy suc cessfully. Operative time ranged from 60 to 180 min(mean, 98.6 min). The intraoperative blood loss ranged from 20 to 50 ml(mean, 35 ml). No postoperative complications were encountered. During the foUow-up period 2 34 months, no ureteric stricture or recurrent calculus had been found, hydronephrosis and hydroureterosis were less ened. Conclusion:Retroperitoneoscopic uretero-lithotomy is a safe and effective minimally invasive procedure. It may be considered as the firstline treatment in selected patients with large, low-order stones, or other complex up per ureteric stones experienced unsuccessful minimally invasive treatments.
出处 《临床泌尿外科杂志》 2013年第2期118-119,122,共3页 Journal of Clinical Urology
关键词 后腹腔镜技术 复杂性输尿管上段结石 治疗学 relroperitoneal laparoscopy complex proximal ureteral calculi therapeutics
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献45

共引文献605

同被引文献84

  • 1马宇杰,黄志远,杨建设,张毅,王威,何育霖.输尿管镜下气压弹道和钬激光碎石术治疗输尿管结石1606例[J].中国实用医刊,2010,37(19):53-54. 被引量:5
  • 2梁培育,欧善际,许海波,颜毅,何书明,李浩勇,彭晓晖,王声兴,肖劲逐.后腹腔镜技术治疗输尿管结石(附31例报告)[J].现代泌尿外科杂志,2006,11(4):212-214. 被引量:11
  • 3吴阶平.吴阶平泌尿外科学[M].济南:山东科学技术出版社,2004.589-591. 被引量:1430
  • 4吴在德.外科学[M].8版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2013:398. 被引量:14
  • 5Lee Y H, Tsai J Y, Jiaan B P, et al. Prospective ran- domized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ure- teroscopie lithotripsy for management of large upper third ureteralstones[J]. Urology, 2006, 67(5) 480- 484. 被引量:1
  • 6Hammady A, Gamal W M, Zaki M, et al. Evaluation of ureteraI stent placement after retroperitoneal laparo- scopic ureterolithotomy for upper ureteral stone: ran- domized controlled study[J]. J Endourol, 2011, 25 (5) : 825-830. 被引量:1
  • 7J GoetR, Aron M, Kesarwani PK,et a/.Percutaneous ante- grade removal of impacted 'upper -ureteral calculi :still the treatment of choice in developing countries[J].J En- dourol, 2005,19(7) : 54-57. '. 被引量:1
  • 8GeRman MT, Box G, Averch T, et al. Consensus statement on natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery and single-incision laparoscopic surgery: heralding a new era in urology? [J]. Eur Urol, 2008, 53(6): 1117-1120. 被引量:1
  • 9Dev HS, Sooriakumamn P, Tewari AK. Single-Site surgery: more oR-LESS?[J]. Eur Urol, 2010, 58(6): 849-850. 被引量:1
  • 10Dev H, Sooriakumaran P, Tewari A, et al. LESSons in minimally invasive urology[J]. BJU Int, 2011, 107(10): 1555-1559. 被引量:1

引证文献12

二级引证文献101

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部