期刊文献+

框架问题的一种可行解 被引量:2

A FEASIBLE SOLUTION TO THE FRAME PROBLEM
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文提出了一种基于实用原则的框架问题的解决方案,证明该方案的表达能力与Reiter的方案等价,分析了两种方案各自的特色及适用范围。提出了效应公理的完备化概念,给出了效应公理的规则表示形式,这些结果为基于意向驱动的agent模型的建立以及面向agent的程序设计语言AOPLID的提出提供了必要的理论基础。 In this paper, a pragmatistic solution to the frame problem is introduced. It is proved that this solution is equivalent to the Reiter's in respect of the power of representation. The characteristic and applicability of two solutions are analysed. The concept of completeness of effect axioms is introduced and a method to transfer an effect axiom into a rule is given. These provide a theoretical foundation for modeling agents with intention driver and the agent-oriented programming language AOPLID.
出处 《模式识别与人工智能》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2000年第2期121-127,共7页 Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence
基金 江苏省青年科技基金
关键词 情境演算 框架问题 可行解 知识表示 人工智能 Situation Calculus, Frame Problem, Agent
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献3

共引文献2

同被引文献22

  • 1G Lakemeyer, H J Levesque. AOL: A logic of acting, sensing,knowing, and only knowing. The 6th Int'l Conf on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR'98), Trento, Italy, 1998. 被引量:1
  • 2G D Giacomo, Y Lesperance, H J Levesque. Reasoning about concurrent execution, prioritized interrupts, and exogenous actions in the situation calculus. The 15th Int'l Joint Conf on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-97), Nagoya, Japan, 1997. 被引量:1
  • 3J McCarthy, P J Hayes. Some philosophical problems from the stand point of artificial intelligence. In: B Meltzer, D Michie eds.Machine Intelligence, Vol 4. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1969. 463-502. 被引量:1
  • 4F Pirri, R Reiter. Some contributions to the metatheory of the situation calculus. Journal of ACM, 1999, 46(3) : 261 -325. 被引量:1
  • 5C E Alchourron, P Gardenfors, D Makinson. On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions.The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 1985, 50(2) : 510-530. 被引量:1
  • 6P Cardenfors. Knowledge in Flux: Modeling the Dynamics of Epistemic States. Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1988. 被引量:1
  • 7P Cardenfors, D Makinson. Revision of knowledge systems using epistemic entrechmnet. In: M Vardi ed. Proc of the 2nd Conf on Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Knowledge. Los Altos,CA: Morgan Kaufmann, 1988. 83-95. 被引量:1
  • 8P Gardenfors, D Makinson. Nonmonotonic inference based on expectations. Artificial Intelligence, 1994, 65(2): 197-245. 被引量:1
  • 9P Gardenfors, H Rott. Belief revision. In: D M Gabbay, C J Hogger, J A Robinson eds. Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming. Oxford: Clarendon Press,1995. 35- 132. 被引量:1
  • 10A Fuhrmann. Relevant logics, modal logics, and theory changes [Ph D dissertation ] . Australian National University, Canberra,1989. 被引量:1

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部