摘要
在村社问题上,马克思恩格斯与同时代的民粹派之间有着复杂的思想渊源关系。民粹派尊重人民的主体地位、立足本国国情探索适合自身的发展道路、试图走一条非资本主义道路的思想具有重要的意义,对马克思恩格斯研究俄国村社和探索俄国发展道路产生了一定的影响和启发。但是,民粹派认为俄国可以在村社基础上依靠农民自身的力量直接进入社会主义,这样,就使他们陷入了形而上学和空想当中,无法向前发展。针对民粹派固有的深刻的历史局限性,马克思恩格斯立足于世界历史和无产阶级总体革命,运用唯物辩证法对之进行了科学批判和超越。在具体问题具体分析的基础上,马克思恩格斯提出了一套关于俄国村社和俄国发展道路的科学设想。
Marx and Engels had complicated relations with their contemporary populists In me ideological origins concerning the issue of Ejido. The populists respected people＇s dominant position, explored the development path suitable for the situation of their own country, and attempted to take a non-capitalist path. These ideas were of very important significance, and had exerted some influence on Marx and Engels in their studies of the Russian Ejido and the Russian development course. But the populists believed that Russian peasants could rely on themselves to establish socialism on the basis of the Ejido. Thus, they were trapped in metaphysics and fantasies and were unable to develop. Marx and Engels resorted to historical materialist dialectics in scientific critique of the populists＇ ideas with the world history and the overall proletarian revolution as the point of departure, and went beyond the populist ideas. Based on focused analyses of specific is- sues, Marx and Engels proposed a set of scientific hypotheses about the Russian Ejido and the development course of Russia.
出处
《教学与研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第2期31-38,共8页
Teaching and Research
基金
中共中央编译局2011年哲学社会科学基金对外招标课题重点项目"马克思恩格斯‘论东方村社’研究"(项目号:11ZB05)的阶段性成果
关键词
马克思恩格斯
民粹派
村社思想
世界历史
无产阶级总体革命
具体问题具体分析
Marx and Engels
populists
Ejido thought
world history
the overall proletarian revolution
focused analysis of specific issues
