期刊文献+

难治性原发性胆汁性肝硬化患者的免疫学随诊 被引量:3

Immunologic analysis of refractory primary biliary cirrhosis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的随诊和总结熊去氧胆酸(UDCA)治疗1年以上的难治性原发性胆汁性肝硬化(PBC)患者与典型PBC患者的免疫学特点异同。方法60例随诊1年以上的PBC患者,根据对UDCA应答情况分为应答良好组(典型组,37例)和应答不良组(难治性组,23例),以年龄、性别匹配的健康志愿者20名(健康对照组),检测各组外周血淋巴细胞亚群、细胞因子等免疫学特点。统计学分析采用独立样本t检验或单因素方差分析。结果①在治疗超过1年的稳定期时,难治性和典型PBC外周血淋巴细胞亚群的差异无统计学意义,但2组的B细胞、T细胞、CD4+T细胞、CD4+CD28+T细胞和CD8‘CD28一T细胞比例均高于健康对照组;②在治疗超过1年的稳定期时,难治性组血清白细胞介素(IL)一6水平[(0.8+0.9)pg/m1]高于典型组[(0.3+0.4)pg/m1];血清肝细胞生长因子(HGF)水平呈现难治性组〉典型组〉健康对照组趋势。结论经过1年以上治疗后,对UDCA应答不良的患者的血清IL.6、HGF等细胞因子较高,提示可能存在较应答良好患者更重的免疫紊乱。 Objective To describe the immunological characteristics of refractory primary biliary cirrhosis compared with the typical patients for more than 1 year's administration of UDCA. Methods Sixty patients treated with UDCA for more than 1 year in our clinic were enrolled into this study. According to the response to UDCA by Paris criteria, patients were divided into refractory group (23 patients) and typical groups (37 patients). The recent peripheral lymphocyte subsets and cytokines of the two groups were tested and analyzed. One-way ANOVA and t test were used for statistical analysis. Results (~ One-year treatment after diagnosis, there were no differences between the two groups in the distribution of peripheral lymphocytic subsets, meanwhile, the two groups had higher percentage of B cells, CD4~ T cells, CD4+ CD28~ T cells and CD8~CD28-T cells than healthy controls respectively. (~) The serum levels of IL-6 [ (0.8_+0.9) pg/ml vs (0.3_+ 0.4) pg/ml ] and HGF were higher in the refractory group than other groups. Conclusion During the plateau phase, refractory PBC patients have higher serum levels of IL-6 and HGF, which probably suggest that the refractory PBC patients may have severe immunologic disturbance in vivo.
出处 《中华风湿病学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第2期86-90,共5页 Chinese Journal of Rheumatology
基金 基金项目:“十一五”国家科技支撑计划(2008BAl59803) 国家科技重大专项项目(2012ZX09303006.002) 行业基金(201202004) 卫生部临床重点课题
关键词 肝硬化 胆汁性 熊去氧胆酸 淋巴细胞亚群 细胞因子类 Liver cirrhosis, biliary Ursodeoxycholic acid Lymphocyte subsets Cytokines
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献25

  • 1施健,刘苏,陈伟忠,曾欣,陈岳祥,杨秀疆,谢渭芬.中等剂量熊去氧胆酸治疗原发性胆汁性肝硬化的系统评价[J].中华消化杂志,2005,25(6):355-358. 被引量:30
  • 2Vasiliy Ivanovich Reshetnyak.Concept on the pathogenesis and treatment of primary biliarycirrhosis[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2006,12(45):7250-7262. 被引量:11
  • 3Kuiper EM, Hansen BE, de Vries RA, et al. Improved prognosis of patients with primary biliary cirrhosis that have a biochemical response to ursodeoxycholic acid. Gastroenterology, 2009, 136: 1281-1287. 被引量:1
  • 4Heathcote EJ. Management of primary biliary cirrhosis: the American Association for the study of liver diseases practice guidelines. Hepatology, 2000, 31: 1005-1013. 被引量:1
  • 5Van Hoogstraten HJ, Hansen BE, van Buuren HR, et al. Prognostic factors and long-term effects of ursodeoxycholic acid on liver biochemical parameters in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. Dutch Multi-Centre PBC Study Group. J Hepatol, 1999, 31: 256-262. 被引量:1
  • 6Shi J, Wu C, Lin Y, et al. Long-term effects of mid-dose ursodeoxycholic acid in primary biliary cirrhosis:a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Gastroenterol, 2006, 101: 1529-1538. 被引量:1
  • 7Paumgartter G. Ursodeoxycholic acid for primary biliary cirrhosis: treat early to slow progression. J Heptol, 2003, 39:112-114. 被引量:1
  • 8Leuschner M, Dietrich CF, Yon T, et al. Characterisation of patients with primary biliary cirrhosis responding to long term ursodeoxycholic acid treatment. Gut, 2000, 46: 121-126. 被引量:1
  • 9Lindor KN. Ursodeoxycholic acid for the treatment of primary biliary cirrhosis. Engl J Med, 2007, 357: 1524-1529. 被引量:1
  • 10Jorgensen R, Angulo P, Dickson ER, et al. Results of long-term ursodiol treatment for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. Am J Gastroenterol, 2002, 97: 2647-2650. 被引量:1

共引文献31

同被引文献26

  • 1Osterreicher CH, Trauner M. Xenobiotic induced liver injury and fibrosis[J]. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol , 2012, 8: 571-580. 被引量:1
  • 2Signl LH. Basicsciencefor the clinician 58: IgG subclasses[J]. J Clin Rheumatol, 2012, 18: 316-318. 被引量:1
  • 3Ludwig J, Wiensner RH, Batts KP, et al. The acute vanishing bileduct syndrome (acute irreversible rejection) after orthotopic liver transplantation[J]. Hepatology , 1987, 7: 476-483. 被引量:1
  • 4Scheuer P. Primary biliary cirrhosis[J]. Proc R Soc Med, 1967, 60: 1257-1260. 被引量:1
  • 5梁扩寰.肝脏病学[M].3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2013:378.379. 被引量:1
  • 6Dickson ER, Grambsch PM, Fleming TR, et al. Prognosis in primary biliary cirrhosis: model for decision making[J]. Hepatolo?gy,1989, 10: 1-7. 被引量:1
  • 7Corpeehot C, Abenacoli L, Rababi N, et al. Biochemical re?sponse to ursodeoxycholic acid and long-term prognosis in prima?ry biliary cirrhosis[J]. Hepatology , 2008, 48: 871-877. 被引量:1
  • 8Poupon R. Primary biliary cirrhosis: a 2010 update[J]. J Hepa?tology , 2010, 52: 745-758. 被引量:1
  • 9Nakamura M, Takii Y, Ito M, et al. Increaseed expression of nuclear envelope gp210 antigen in small bile ducts in primary biliary cirrhosis[J]. J Autoimmun , 2006, 26: 138-145. 被引量:1
  • 10Nakamura M, Kondo H, Mori T, et al. Anti-gp210 andanticen?tromere antibodies are different risk factors for theprogression of primary biliary cirrhosis[J]. Hepatology, 2007, 45: 118-127. 被引量:1

引证文献3

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部