期刊文献+

专利钓饵对中国专利制度的挑战及其防范措施研究 被引量:15

Study on the Challenges that Patent Trolls Made on China's Patent System and China's Countermeasures
原文传递
导出
摘要 专利钓饵已经进驻中国,对我国的专利制度提出了严峻的挑战。在回顾相关文献的基础上,探讨了专利钓饵的制度成因,分析了专利钓饵的影响以及美国法院、企业的防范措施。在此基础上,研究了我国专利制度中可能被专利钓饵利用的"漏洞",并结合我国专利制度的特点,参考国外对专利钓饵的防范措施,提出了对我国企业、政府防范专利钓饵的诉讼建议。 The patent trolls have entered into China and posed a severe challenge on China's patent system.The paper explored the institutional reasons of patent trolls’forming,analyzed the impact of patent trolls and the countermeasures which United States' courts and enterprises has adopted based on reviewing the relevant literatures.Then,the paper studied the 'loopholes' of China's patent system which may be used by patent trolls,and with combining the characteristics of China's patent system and making reference for countermeasures that the foreign country has adopted,the paper provided recommendations for China's enterprises and government to avoid the risk of litigation and respond to trolls’litigation attacks effectively
出处 《科学学与科学技术管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第1期12-19,共8页 Science of Science and Management of S.& T.
基金 国家自然科学基金重点项目"促进我国自主创新的知识产权管理研究"(70633003) 教育部人文社会科学基金规划项目"LED产业专利分散度测量及专利战略选择研究"(11YJA630188)
关键词 专利钓饵 专利制度 赔偿 禁令 停止侵权 专利交易 patent trolls patent system compensation ban stop the infringement patent trade
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Hagiu A,Yoffie D,Wagonfeld A D. Intellectual Ventures[Harvard Business Strategy Unit:HBS Case No.710-423][R].2009. 被引量:1
  • 2岳哲平,张晓东.高智发明公司启动诉讼的影响分析[J].电子知识产权,2011(6):26-30. 被引量:7
  • 3Jensen P H,Palangkaraya A,Webster E. Disharmony in intemational patent office decision[J].The Federal Circuit Bar Journal,2006,(04):679-704. 被引量:1
  • 4Ailison J R,Lemley M. The growing complexity of the united states patent system[J].HeinOnline-B U L Rew,2002,(82):77-135. 被引量:1
  • 5Fischer T,Henkel J. Patent Trolls on Markets for Technology:An Empirical Analysis of Trolls' Patent Acquisitions[R].Technische Universit(a)t München,SSRN,2011. 被引量:1
  • 6曹勇,黄颖.专利钓饵的诉讼战略及其新发展[J].情报杂志,2012,31(1):25-30. 被引量:15
  • 7Shapiro C. Injunction,hold-up,and patent royalties[J].American Economic Review,2010,(02):509-557. 被引量:1
  • 8Schaerr G C,Loshin J R. Doing Battle with 'Patent Trolls' Lessons from the Litigation Front Lines[R].Winstin Strawn LLP,2011. 被引量:1
  • 9Shapiro C,Lemley M A. Patent holdup and royalty stacking[J].Texas Law Review,2007,(85):1991-2049. 被引量:1
  • 10allGregory J K. The troll next door[J].The John Marsh Review of Intellectual Property Law,2007,(292):6-7. 被引量:1

二级参考文献96

共引文献87

同被引文献172

引证文献15

二级引证文献43

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部