期刊文献+

宁夏回族自治区高血压城镇社区健康教育干预效果 被引量:2

Intervention effect of community-based health education on hypertension in towns of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价宁夏回族自治区城镇社区进行高血压健康知识教育和健康促进干预策略的有效性。方法对采取分层整群随机抽取的12个城镇社区843例高血压患者采用集中授课、发放宣传材料等健康教育措施,对比干预前后高血压患者的治疗率、控制率和体质指数(BMI)达标情况以及不良生活方式改变情况。结果健康干预后,与干预前比较所纳入高血压患者的治疗率(48.44%vs.58.50%)、血压控制达标率(40.95%vs.71.56%)、BMI达标率(37.82%vs.49.66%)均升高,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);干预前后平均收缩压[(137.70±14.83)mmHgvs.(136.09±11.08)mmHg]及舒张压[(84.59±10.55)mmHgvs.(83.23±7.11)mmHg]下降,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);高血压危险因素,吸烟率(16.03%vs.10.33%)和饮酒率(9.51%vs.6.66%)下降;合理运动率(21.36%vs.50.20%)和低盐饮食率(8.57%vs.19.46%)升高,且差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论社区健康教育能够提高居民健康生活水平,健康干预对高血压控制具有良好的促进作用。 Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of intervention strategies in hypertension health education and health improvement in urban communities of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region. Methods The hypertension patients ( n =735 ) selected by stratified-cluster randomized sampling from three town communities were given lesions and publicity materials. The treatment rate, control rate, body mass index (BMI) and changes of adverse life style were compared before and after the intervention. Results After health education intervention, the treatment rate ( 48.44% vs. 58.50% ) , control rate ( 40.95% vs . 71.56% ) and BMI standard rate ( 37.82% vs . 49.66% ) increased in all selected patients ( P 0.05 ) . The average level of systolic blood pressure ( 137.70 ± 14.83 mmHg vs. 136.09 ± 11.08 mmHg ) and diastolic blood pressure ( 84.59 ± 10.55 mmHg vs . 83.23 ± 7.11 mmHg ) decreased ( P 0.05 ) . The smoking rate ( 16.03% vs . 10.33% ) and drinking rate ( 9.51% vs . 6.66% ) decreased. The reasonable sport rate ( 21.36% vs. 50.20% ) and low-salt diet rate ( 8.57% vs. 19.46% ) increased ( P 0.05 ) . Conclusion The community-based health education can improve the health life level and is effective in hypertension control.
出处 《中国循证心血管医学杂志》 2012年第6期521-523,共3页 Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Cardiovascular Medicine
基金 宁夏回族自治区科技攻关项目(2007-182)
关键词 高血压 社区 健康教育 效果 Hypertension Community Health education result evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Yusuf S,Reddy S,OunPuu S,et al. Global burden of cardiovascular disease:part I :general considerations,the epidemiologic transition,risk factors,and impact of urbanization[J]. Circulation,2001, 104( 13): 2746-53. 被引量:1
  • 2World Health Organization,International Society of Hypertension Writing Group.2003 World Health Organization(WHO)/International Society of Hypertension (ISH)statement on management of hypertension[J]. J Hypertens, 2003,21(11): 1983-92. 被引量:1
  • 3Saptharishi L,Soudarssanane M,Thiruselvakumar D,et al. Community- based Randomized Controlled Trial of Non-pharmacological Interventions in Prevention and Control of Hypertension among Young Adults[J]. Indian J Community Med, 2009,34(4): 329-34. 被引量:1
  • 4中国高血压防治指南修汀委员会.中国高血压防治指南(2005年修订版)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2006:7-12. 被引量:1
  • 5中华人民共和国卫生部疾病控制司.中国成人超重和肥胖症预防控制指南(2005年版)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社.2006:30-8. 被引量:1
  • 6王陇德主编..中国居民营养与健康状况调查报告 之一 2002综合报告[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2005:200.
  • 7马列,贾绍斌,龚杰,王义勇,丛广志,罗彩琴.宁夏回族自治区银川市高血压病流行病学调查[J].广东医学,2010,31(23):3118-3121. 被引量:11
  • 8So AY, Kim YM, Kiln EY, et al. Effects of community-based case management program for clients with hypertension[J]. J Korean Acad Nurs,2008,38(6): 822-30. 被引量:1
  • 9Balcazar HG,Byrd TL,Ortiz M,et al. A randomized community intervention to improve hypertension control among Mexican Americans:using the promotoras de salud community outreach model[J]. J Health Care Poor Underserved,2009,20(4): 1079-94. 被引量:1
  • 10王增武,王馨,张林峰,王文,陈伟伟,朱曼路,胡盛寿,雷振龙,孔灵芝,刘力生.社区高血压控制:血压管理效果的评价[J].中华流行病学杂志,2010,31(1):1-4. 被引量:86

二级参考文献49

共引文献159

同被引文献27

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部