期刊文献+

激光粒度仪与沉降吸管法测定喀斯特地区土壤机械组成的对比研究 被引量:17

Comparative Study on Determining Soil Particle Size Distribution Measured by Laser Diffraction and the Sieve-Pipette Method in Karst Regions
原文传递
导出
摘要 与传统的沉降吸管法相比,激光粒度仪在测定土壤机械组成时具有效率高、操作误差低的优势,但其粘粒含量的测试结果通常偏低。本文在桂西北喀斯特地区选取具有代表性的棕色石灰土和砂页岩红壤土,包括表土和剖面样品共70个,对比分析激光粒度分析仪和沉降吸管法的测定结果,并建立不同粒级二者之间的相互转换关系。结果表明:按照美国制分类标准,与沉降吸管法相比,激光粒度仪测试的粘粒(<0.002 mm)体积含量均偏低,粉粒(0.002 mm-0.05 mm)含量均偏高,粘粒和粉粒的相对误差均随吸管法粘粒含量的增大而增加,砂粒含量(0.05 mm-2 mm)则互有高低且平均相对误差最小。两种方法测定的粘粒及砂粒间具有极显著的相关关系,粉粒相关性不显著,但<0.02 mm粒级呈极显著线性相关。激光粒度仪和传统吸管法的测试结果可通过<0.002 mm、<0.02 mm、0.02 mm-0.05 mm及>0.05 mm四个粒级的回归方程建立转换关系。 Compared with the traditional sieve-pipette method, the laser diffraction method is a new technology for determination of soil particle size distribution, which has obvious advantages in measurement efficiency and operation error reducing. However, the laser diffraction method always underestimates the clay content. In order to set up the conversion models, 70 soil samples selected from karst areas of Northwest Guangxi were measured by Mastersize2000 laser diffraction and the sieve-pipette method. The results showed that based on the classification criteria of USDA (United States Department of Agriculture), the clay volume content (〈 0.002 mm) using the laser diffraction method was lower than that using the sieve-pipette method, while the silt volume content (0.002 mm - 0.05 ram) was higher. The relative errors of the clay and silt contents increased with the increase of clay content measured by sieve-pipette. The sand content was sometimes higher and sometimes lower with the lowest relative error. Significant relationships were found between the clay and sand contents determined by the two methods, but not between the silt content. However, the 〈 0.02 mm content measured by the two methods was significantly correlated. The laser diffraction measured results of soil particle size distribution could be converted by the linear regression equation of the following four particles grades including 〈 0.002 mm, 〈 0.02 mm, 0.02 mm- 0.05 mm and 〉 0.05 mm.
出处 《农业现代化研究》 CSCD 北大核心 2013年第1期100-103,共4页 Research of Agricultural Modernization
基金 中国科学院战略性先导科技专项子课题(编号:XDA05070403) 国家自然科学基金项目(编号:41171187) 国家科技支撑计划课题(编号:2010BAE00739-02)
关键词 喀斯特地区 土壤机械组成 沉降吸管法 激光粒度仪 转换模型 karst areas soil particle size sieve-pipette method laser diffraction method conversion model
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1黄昌勇主编..土壤学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000:311.
  • 2刘光崧主编..土壤理化分析与剖面描述[M].北京:中国标准出版社,1996:266.
  • 3Beuselinck L, Govers G, Poesen J, et al. Grain-size analysis by laser diffractometry: comparison with the sieve-pipette method [J]. Catena, 1998, 32(3-4): 193-208. 被引量:1
  • 4Syvitski J P M, Leblanc K W G, Asprey K W. Principles, Methods and Application of Particle Size Analysis [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991: 174-193. 被引量:1
  • 5McCave I N, Bryant R J, Cook H F, et al. Evaluation of a laser-diffraction-size analyzer for use with natural sediments [J]. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 1986, 56(4): 561-564. 被引量:1
  • 6舒霞,吴玉程,程继贵,夏永红,郑玉春.Mastersizer 2000激光粒度分析仪及其应用[J].合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版),2007,30(2):164-167. 被引量:44
  • 7Buurman P, Pape T, Reijneveld J A, et al. Laser-diffraction and pipette-method grain sizing of Dutch sediments: correlations for fine fractions of marine, fluvial, and loess samples [J]. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences, 2001, 80(2): 49-51. 被引量:1
  • 8杨金玲,张甘霖,李德成,潘继花.激光法与湿筛-吸管法测定土壤颗粒组成的转换及质地确定[J].土壤学报,2009,46(5):772-780. 被引量:59
  • 9Eshel G, Levy G J, Mingelgrin U, et al. Critical evaluation of the use of laser diffraction for particle-size distribution analysis [J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2004, 68(3): 736-743. 被引量:1
  • 10王成燕,张丽君.激光法与传统方法比较测定土壤粒度分布的研究[J].环境与发展,2010,22(6):57-62. 被引量:11

二级参考文献63

共引文献270

同被引文献237

引证文献17

二级引证文献240

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部