期刊文献+

术中单极和双极射频消融治疗心房纤颤的疗效与安全性比较 被引量:6

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较单极与双极射频消融改良迷宫术在心脏手术中治疗心房纤颤(房颤)的疗效与安全性。方法:我院自2007年1月至2011年3月共有81例房颤患者于心脏手术同期进行射频消融改良迷宫术治疗房颤,其中58例采用双极消融(双极组),23例采用单极消融(单极组)。收集所有患者的临床资料,比较两组患者术后窦性心律维持率、手术时间、围术期严重并发症的发生率及死亡率等。结果:平均随访(15.1±12.6)个月,两组患者术后窦性心律维持率比较差异无统计学意义(P=0.199);围术期严重并发症的发生率及死亡率均无显著差异,但双极消融所需时间比单极消融明显较短[(28.1±8.5)minvs(19.7±4.6)min,P<0.01]。结论:心脏瓣膜手术中,单极和双极射频消融均为治疗房颤有效、安全的方法,但采用双极消融更方便快捷。
出处 《实用医学杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2013年第1期75-77,共3页 The Journal of Practical Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献49

  • 1肖锡俊,袁宏声,唐红,黄云,崔永强,曹舸,田子朴,黄旭中.术中盐水冲洗的射频改良迷宫手术治疗二尖瓣病变伴心房颤动[J].中国胸心血管外科临床杂志,2005,12(2):73-75. 被引量:15
  • 2郑斯宏,孙衍庆,孟旭,高峰,黄福华.左心房折叠术在二尖瓣病变合并巨大左心房治疗中的应用[J].中华外科杂志,2005,43(14):918-920. 被引量:28
  • 3孟旭,王坚刚.心内直视下射频消融术治疗心房纤颤[J].中华胸心血管外科杂志,2005,21(4):247-248. 被引量:62
  • 4Sueda T,Nagata H,Q rihashi K,et al.Efficacy of a simple left atrial produce for chronic atrial fibrillation in mitral valve operations[J].Ann Thorac Surg,1997,63(4):1070-1075. 被引量:1
  • 5Cobb F R,Blumenschein S D,Sealy W C,et al.Successful surgical interruption of the bundle of Kent in a patient with Wolff-Paikinson-White syndrome[J].Circulation,1998,38(6):1018-1029. 被引量:1
  • 6Usui A,Inden Y,Mizutani S,et al.Repetitive atrial flutter as a complication of the left-side simple Maze procedure[J].Ann Thorac Surg,2002,73(3):1457-1459. 被引量:1
  • 7Sie H T,Beukema W P,Elvan A,et al.Long-term results of irrigated radiofrequency modified maze procedure in 200 patients with concomitant cardiac surgery:six years experience[J].Ann Thorac Surg,2004,77(2):512-517. 被引量:1
  • 8Khargi K,Hutten B A,Lemke B,et al.Surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation; a systematic review[J].Eur J Cardiothorac Surg,2005,27 (2):258-265. 被引量:1
  • 9Cox J L,Schuessler R B,D'Agostino H J Jr,et al.The surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation.Ⅲ.Development of a definitive surgical procedure[J].Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,1991,101(4):569-583. 被引量:1
  • 10Cox J L,Jaquiss R D B,Schuessler R B,et al.Modification of the maze procedure for atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation.Ⅱ.Surgical technique of the maze Ⅲ procedure[J].Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,1995,110(2):485-495. 被引量:1

共引文献88

同被引文献45

  • 1刘志勇,李旭东,王洪斌,李鸿雁,王玉华,何伟,周建明.盐水冲洗射频改良迷宫Ⅲ手术治疗心房颤动的临床效果[J].中国胸心血管外科临床杂志,2006,13(6):432-433. 被引量:7
  • 2陈劲进,汪曾炜.心房颤动外科消融的回顾与展望[J].中华外科杂志,2007,45(16):1142-1144. 被引量:3
  • 3Cox JL, Schuessler RB, Boineau JP. An 8 year experience with surgery for atrial fibrillation[J]. Ann Surg, 1996, 224: 267-273. 被引量:1
  • 4yon Oppell UO, Masani N, O'Callaghan P, et al. Mitral valve surgery plus concomitant atrial fibrillation ablation is superior to mitral valve surgery alone with an intensive rhythm control strategy[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2009, 35(4) : 641- 650. 被引量:1
  • 5Nardi P, Mve Mvondo C, Scafuri A, et al. Left atrial radiofrequeney ablation associated with valve surgery: midterm outcomes[J]. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2013, 61 (5) : 392-397. 被引量:1
  • 6Maltais S, Forcillo J, Bouchard D, et al. Long-term results following concomitant radiofrequency modified maze ablation for atrial fibrillation[J].J Card Surg, 2010, 25 (5): 608-613. 被引量:1
  • 7Dong L, Fu B, Teng X, et al. Clinical analysis of concomitant valve replacement and bipolar radiofrequency ablation in 191 patients[ J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2013, 145(4) :1013-1017. 被引量:1
  • 8Cox JL, Ad N, Palazzo T, et al. Current status of the Maze procedure for the treatment of atrial fibrillation [ J ]. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,2000,12 ( 1 ) : 15-19. 被引量:1
  • 9Onan B, Onan IS, Caynak B, et al. Comparison of the results of Irriga- ted monopolar and bipolar radiofrequency ablation in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation [ J ]. Anadolu Kardiyol Derg, 2011,11 ( 1 ) :39-47. 被引量:1
  • 10周勇,李莉,徐志云,韩林.瓣膜置换同时射频消融隔离肺静脉治疗风湿性瓣膜性心脏病永久性房颤[J].中华老年多器官疾病杂志,2009,8(1):32-34. 被引量:7

引证文献6

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部