摘要
德国在国际法院诉意大利一案已有定论,2012年2月3日国际法院认定即使是德国作出违反国际法的行为,仍然不能够剥夺其应享有的国家豁免权。在司法实践中国际强行法规则屡屡让步于国家豁免权,这也使得国际法学界更加关注国家豁免权与国际强行法之间的关系。为了协调二者的关系,可以考虑将国家管辖豁免权加以限制,将违反国际强行法规则的行为作为国家管辖豁免权的一种例外。就执行豁免而言,还需更为谨慎地处理其与国际强行法的关系。
International Court of Justice had closed the case Germany v.Italy on 3th February 2012 and holds that Italy cannot deprive immunity that Germany enjoys even its action has violated international law.Practically,jus cogens often gives way to the state immunity some cases.The above case causes great attention on the relationship between jus cogens and state immunity.In order to reconcile jus cogens and state immunity,it＇s possible that putting restriction on state immunity and making violation of jus cogens being an exception to jurisdictional immunity.It needs more cautious to deal with the relationship between execution immunity and jus cogens.
出处
《河北法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第1期24-32,共9页
Hebei Law Science
基金
2010年度教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目<中国国家豁免法立法问题研究>(10JJD820004)的阶段性成果
关键词
国际法院
国际强行法
国家管辖豁免权
international court of justice
Jus Cogens
jurisdictional immunity
