期刊文献+

克罗恩病内镜评分标准与疾病活动度相关性研究 被引量:4

Correlation between endoscopic scoring systems and disease activity for Crohn's disease
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价国内外两种不同的克罗恩病(CD)内镜评分标准与CD临床疾病活动度以及两种评分标准间的一致性。方法选择2007年7月至2011年8月在本院行内镜检查(全结肠镜或双气囊小肠镜)的CD患者共70例,按国内标准(CGSCD)与简化CD内镜评分(SESCD)两种评分标准由2位医师独立评价,并收集同期临床资料与实验室指标,数据处理使用SPSS13.0。结果 SESCD与CGSCD两种评分标准之间具有显著的相关性,Spearman相关系数为0.776(P<0.01)。这两种内镜评分标准与血沉(ESR)、C反应蛋白、红细胞压积、血红蛋白、简化CDAI之间均有统计学意义的相关性(P<0.05),但简化CD内镜评分标准与疾病临床活动度的相关性更大。两种内镜评分标准在治疗前后的变化值与ESR、CRP、HCT、HB、简化CDAI的变化值间均无统计学意义上的相关性(P>0.05)。结论 CD的两种内镜分级和评分标准具有显著的一致性,且与疾病临床活动度以及评价活动度的实验室指标均具有较良好的相关性,但与治疗前后疾病活动度变化并不一致。国内CD内镜分级标准尚待改进。 Objective To assess the agreement of two different endoscopic scoring systems for Crohn's disease (CD) and the correlation between these endoscopy grading and disease activity. Methods The data of seventy patients with an established diagnosis of CD, who underwent endoscopy (colonscopy or double balloon enteroscopy) in Shanghai Ruijin Hospital from July 2007 to August 2011, were evaluated with Chinese grading system (CGSCD) and simple endoscopic score for CD (SESCD) by two physicians independently. Data were analyzed with SPSS 13. 0. Clinical data and laboratory parameters over the same period were also collected. Results The agreement for the two endoscopic scoring systems was excellent, Spearman' s correlation coefficient was 0. 776 (〈0.01). Both endoscopic scoring systems had a significant correlation with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (RSR), C-reactive protein (CRP), hematocrit (HCT), hemoglobin (HB) and simple CD activity index (simple CDAI) (P〈0.05), while SESCD was more relevant to clinical activity. There was no significant correlation between changes of these two endoscopic scoring systems after treatment with ESR, CRP, HCT, HB and simple CDAI. Conclusions There is significant concordance between these two endoscopic scoring systems, which both have satisfactory correlation with clinical activity and laboratory parameters. But these endoscopic scoring systems are not synchronized with the change of disease activity after treatment. CGSCD needs further improvement.
出处 《国际消化病杂志》 CAS 2012年第6期376-379,共4页 International Journal of Digestive Diseases
关键词 克罗恩病 内镜检查 评分标准 疾病活动度 Crohn' s disease Endoscopic Scoring system Disease activity
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Van Assche G,Dignass A, Panes J,et al. The second Europeanevidence-based Consensus onthe diagnosis and management ofCrohn’s disease: definitions and diagnosis. J Crohn’s Colitis,2010,4: 7-27. 被引量:1
  • 2Thia KT,Loftus EV Jr,Sandborn WJ,et al. An update on theepidemiology of inflammatory bowel disease in Asia. Am JGastroenterol, 2008,103: 3167-3182. 被引量:1
  • 3中华医学会消化分会.对炎症性肠病诊断治疗规范的建议.现代实用医学,2003,. 被引量:2
  • 4邹开芳,杨杰,丁炎波.炎症性肠病内镜诊断标准及评估[J].临床消化病杂志,2006,18(3):143-144. 被引量:12
  • 5Dapemo M,D? Haens G, Van Assche G,et al. Develpment andvalidation of a new, simplified endoscopic activity score forCrohn’s disease: the SES-CD. Gastmintest Endosc,2004,60:505-512. 被引量:1
  • 6W almsley RS, Ayres RC , Pounder RE , et al. A simpleclinicalcolitis activity index. Gut, 1998,43: 29-32. 被引量:1
  • 7Herfath H, Rogler G. Inflammatory bowel disease.Endoscopy, 2005 , 37: 42-47. 被引量:1
  • 8Mary JY, Modigliani R. Development and validation ofan endoscopic index of the severity for Crohnf s disease: aprospective multicentre study. Groupe d, EtudesTherapeutiques des Affections Inflammatoires du Tube Digestif(GETAID). Gut, 1989, 30: 983-989. 被引量:1
  • 9Sipponen T, Nuutinen H, Turunen U,et al. Endoscopicevaluation of Crohn’s disease activity: comparison of the CDEISand the SES^CD. Inflamm Bowel Dis, 2010, 16; 2131-2136. 被引量:1
  • 10Vermeire S, Van Assche G, Rutgeerts P. Oreac'tiveprotein as a marker for inflammatory bowel disease. InflammBowel Dis, 2004,10 : 661-665. 被引量:1

共引文献12

同被引文献70

引证文献4

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部