期刊文献+

Structure-dependent difference equations for time integration

Structure-dependent difference equations for time integration
下载PDF
导出
摘要 A structure-dependent explicit method with enhanced stability properties is proposed in this study. In general, the method offers unconditional stability for structural systems except those with a particular instantaneous stiffness hardening behavior. In addition, it is second-order accurate and displays no overshooting in high frequency responses. Numerical experiments reveal that the proposed method saves a substantial amount of computational effort in solving inertial problems where only the low frequency responses are of interest, when compared to a general second-order accurate integration method. A structure-dependent explicit method with enhanced stability properties is proposed in this study. In general, the method offers unconditional stability for structural systems except those with a particular instantaneous stiffness hardening behavior. In addition, it is second-order accurate and displays no overshooting in high frequency responses. Numerical experiments reveal that the proposed method saves a substantial amount of computational effort in solving inertial problems where only the low frequency responses are of interest, when compared to a general second-order accurate integration method.
出处 《Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration》 SCIE EI CSCD 2012年第4期485-498,共14页 地震工程与工程振动(英文刊)
基金 The Science Council,Chinese Taipei Under Grant No.NSC-99-2221-E-027-029
关键词 time history analysis structure-dependent difference equation STABILITY ACCURACY time history analysis structure-dependent difference equation stability accuracy
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Bathe KJ (2007), "Conserving Energy and Momentum in Nonlinear Dynamics: A Simple Implicit Time Integration Schemes," Computers & Structures, 85: 437-445. 被引量:1
  • 2Bathe KJ and Baig MMI (2005), "On a Composite Implicit Time Integration Procedure for Nonlinear Dynamics," Computers & Structures, 83:2513-2534. 被引量:1
  • 3Bathe KJ and Wilson EL (1973), "Stability and Accuracy Analysis of Direct Integration Methods," Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 1: 283-291. 被引量:1
  • 4Belytschko T and Hughes T JR (1983), Computational Methods for Transient Analysis, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., North-Holland. 被引量:1
  • 5Bursi OS, He L, Lamarche CP and Bonelli A (2010),"Linearly Implicit Time Integration Methocis for Real-time Dynamic Substructure Testing," Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 136(11 ): 1380-1389. 被引量:1
  • 6Chang SY (1996), "A Series of Energy Conserving Algorithms for Structural Dynamics," Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, 19(2): 219-230. 被引量:1
  • 7Chang SY (1997), "Improved Numerical Dissipation for Explicit Methods in Pseudodynamic Tests," Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 26:917-929. 被引量:1
  • 8Chang SY (2000), "The y-Function Pseudodynamic Algorithm," Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 4(3): 303-320. 被引量:1
  • 9Chang SY (2002), "Explicit Pseudodynamic Algorithm with Unconditional Stability," Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 128(9): 935-947. 被引量:1
  • 10Chang SY (2007), "Improved Explicit Method for Structural Dynamics," Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 133(7): 748-760. 被引量:1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部