摘要
部分学者提出的后现代主义将传统环境法学研究范式由"主客二分"改变为"主客一体",有利于环境法学研究的进步以及环保观念的转变。但是后现代主义以消解主客体为代价的"主客一体"以及后现代主义不确定性、自我解构性、不可实践性、反科学性与环境法学普适性、稳定性、实践性、技术性等特性的冲突,在一定程度上使得其难以符合环境法和环境保护的内在要求,因此后现代主义要成为环境法学研究范式还值得商榷。
Some scholars propose to change postmodernism paradigm for traditional environmental law, and ＂Sub- ject-object Dichotomy＂ for ＂Subject-object Integration＂ ,which is favorable to the environment law research progress and the transformation of the notion of environmental protection. Because postmodernism subject and object digestion and postmodernism is uncertainty, self deconstruction, no practice, and antiscience while the environment Law is u- niversality, stability, practicality and technicality, To a certain extent it is difficult to comply environmental law with the inherent requirement of the environmental protection, so the research paradigm of environmental law is debata- ble.
出处
《湖南工程学院学报（社会科学版）》
2012年第4期84-86,91,共4页
Journal of Hunan Institute of Engineering(Social Science Edition)
关键词
范式
后现代主义
环境法
冲突
paradigm
postmodernism
environmental law
conflict
