期刊文献+

多西他赛联合希罗达在晚期胃癌的疗效分析 被引量:2

Effect Analysis of Docetaxel Combined With Xeloda for Late-staged Gastric Cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨多西他赛联合希罗达治疗晚期胃癌的疗效及不良反应发生情况。方法将86例晚期胃癌患者回顾性分为多西他赛联合希罗达治疗组(多西他赛联合组)及奥沙利铂联合希罗达治疗组(奥沙利铂联合组),观察两组治疗的远近期疗效及毒副反应发生情况。结果多西他赛联合组和奥沙利铂联合组的有效率分别为65.1%、55.8%(P=0.049),两组不良反应主要为胃肠道反应和骨髓抑制(P>0.05);两组的无进展生存时间分别为6.5个月、6.7个月(P>0.05),1年生存率分别为40.1%、39.3%(P>0.05)。结论多西他赛联合希罗达治疗晚期胃癌的有效率优于奥沙利铂联合希罗达,但并不能显著提高患者的生存率。 Objective To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of Docetaxel plus Xeloda in the treatment of late-staged gastric cancer. Methods From May 2009 to May 2011,86 patients with late-staged gastric cancer treated in our depart- merit were divided into two groups in a random way. One group was treated with Docetaxel plus Xeloda ( Docetaxel group) , the other group was treated with Oxaliplatin plus Xeloda (Oxaliplatin group). Then compare the effecary and toxicity of the two groups. Results The efficient was 65.1% (28 cases) and 55.8% (24 cases) in the Docetaxel group and Oxaliplatin group respectively(P =0.049). The main adverse reactions were gastrointestinal reactions and bone marrow transplant(P 〉 0.05). And the median progression-free survival were 6.5 month and 6.7 month ( P 〉 0.05 ) ; 1 year survival rate were 40. 1% and 39.3% (P 〉 0.05) respectively. Conclusion Docetaxel plus Xeloda is a more effective treatment regiment for late-staged gastric cancer than Oxaliplatin plus Xeloda treatment regiment. But it may not increase the survival rate.
出处 《中南医学科学杂志》 CAS 2012年第6期585-587,共3页 Medical Science Journal of Central South China
关键词 胃癌 多西他赛 奥沙利铂 希罗达 gastric cancer Docetaxel Oxaliplatin Xeloda
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Cervantes A, Rosello S, Roda D, et al. The treatment of advanced gastric cancer:current strategies and future per- spectives [ J ]. Ann Oncol, 2008,19 ( Suppl 5 ) : 103-107. 被引量:1
  • 2徐瑞华,滕开原.晚期胃癌化疗进展[J].癌症,2009,28(10):1108-1113. 被引量:98
  • 3Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al. New guide- lines to evaluate the response to treatment in solidtumors. European Organization for Research and Treat- ment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute Of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada[ J ]. J NailCa- ricer Inst, 2000,92 ( 3 ) : 205-216. 被引量:1
  • 4Wagner AD, Grothe W, Haerting J, et al. Chemotherapy in ad,anced gastric cancer:a systematic review and meta- analysis based on aggregate data[J]. J Clin 0ncol,2006, 24 ( 18 ) : 2903-2909. 被引量:1
  • 5张百红,王湘辉,杨文元.Ⅳ期胃癌无进展生存期分析[J].山西医科大学学报,2010,41(7):591-593. 被引量:10
  • 6Kang YK, Kang WK, Shin DB, et al. Capecitabine/cispla- tin versus 5-fluomuracil/eisplatin as first-line therapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer: a randomised phase llI noninferiority trial [ J ]. Ann Onc01, 2009, 20 ( 4 ) : 666-673. 被引量:1
  • 7Cunningham D, Rao S, Starling N,et al. Randomised mu- hicentre phase m study comparing capecitabine with flu- orouracil and oxaliplatin with cisplatin in patients with ad- vanced oesophagogastric (OG)cancer:The REAL 2 trial [J]. J Clin 0ncol,2006,24( 18 Suppl) :4017. 被引量:1
  • 8陈永静,许翠萍,马峻杰.奥沙利铂联合5-FU和CF术前治疗直肠癌28例疗效观察[J].中南医学科学杂志,2012,40(3):287-290. 被引量:1
  • 9A1-Batran S, Hartmann Jrr, Probst S, et al. A randomized phase III trial in patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach receiving first-line chemotherapy with flu- orouracil, leucovorin and oxaliplatin ( FLO ) versus flu- orouracil, leucovorin and cisplatin (FLP) [ J ]. Proceeding ASCO, 2006,18 (5) : Abstract4016. 被引量:1
  • 10Ajani JA, Moiseyenko VM, Tjulandin S, et al. Clinical benefit with docetaxel plus fluorouracil and cisplatin compared with cisplatin and fluorouracil in a phase ]II trial of advanced gastric or gastroesophageal cancer ade- nocarcinoma : the V-325 Study Group [ J ]. J Clin Oncol, 2007,25(22) :3205-3209. 被引量:1

二级参考文献64

  • 1Parkin DM, Pisani P, Ferlay J. Estimates of the worldwide incidence of eighteen major cancers in 1985 [J]. Int J Cancer, 1993,54(4) :594-606. 被引量:1
  • 2Parkin DM, Bray FI, Devesa SS Cancer burden in the year 2000 [J] The global picture. Eur J Cancer, 2001,37(Suppl 8) : S4-S66. 被引量:1
  • 3Kamangar F, Dores GM, Anderson WF. Patterns of cancer incidence, mortality, and prevalence across five continents: defining priorities to reduce disparities in different geographic regions of the world [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2006,24(14) :2137-2150. 被引量:1
  • 4Pyrhonen S, Kuitunen T, Nyandoto P, et al. Randomised comparison of fluorouracil, epidoxorubicin and methotrexate (FEMTX) plus supportive care with supportive care alone in patients with non-resectable gastric cancer [J]. Br J Cancer,1995,71(3):587-591. 被引量:1
  • 5Murad AM, Santiago FF, Petroianu A, et al. Modified therapy with 5- fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and methotrexate in advanced gastric cancer [J]. Cancer, 1993,72(1):37-41. 被引量:1
  • 6Schethauer W, Kornek G, Zeh B. Palliative chemotherapy vs supportive care in patients with metastatic gastric cancer: a randomized trial [C]. Second International Conference on Biology, Prevention and Treatment of Gastrointestinal malignancies. Koln, 1995 : 65. 被引量:1
  • 7Glimelius B, Ekstrom K, Hoffman K, et al. Randomized comparison between chemotherapy plus best supportive care with best supportive care in advanced gastric cancer [J]. Ann Oncol, 1997, 8(2) : 163-168. 被引量:1
  • 8Wils JA, Klein HO, Wagener DJ, et al. Sequential high-dose methotrexate and fiuorouracil combined with doxorubicin-a step ahead in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer: a trial of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gastrointestinal Tract Cooperative Group [J]. J Clin Oncol, 1991,9(5): 827-831. 被引量:1
  • 9Webb A, Cunningham D, Scarffe JH, et al. Randomized trial comparing epirubicin, eisplatin, and fluorouraeil versus fluorouraeil, doxorubiein, and methotrexate in advanced esophagogastric cancer [J]. J Clin Oncol, 1997,15 ( 1 ) : 261-267. 被引量:1
  • 10Massuti B, Cervantes A, Aranda E, et al. A phase Ⅲ multicenter randomized trial in advanced gastric cancer: Fluorouracil +leucovorin + epirubicin + cisplatin (FLEP) vs Fluorouracilo + adriamycin+ methotrexate + leucovorin (FAMTX): response and survival [C]. Sixth International Congress on Anti- cancer Treatment, Paris, 1996. 被引量:1

共引文献106

同被引文献15

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部