摘要
美国是世界上最早采取反补贴措施的国家。关贸总协议成立之前,美国的反补贴法是具有代表性的反补贴法律规范。伴随着多边贸易体制的发展,美国反补贴法也在进一步完善,不仅增加了"国内产业损害"的实质性要求,还修订了征收反补贴税和启动司法审查的具体程序,规定了行政当局初裁和终裁的期限,赋予国内生产商申请法律救济的途径。反补贴法还授权总统就补贴协议与外国进行谈判。然而长期以来,美国反补贴法在是否适用于非市场经济这一问题上却一直语焉不详,这与同出一辙的反倾销法形成鲜明对比。2012年3月,美国国会通过了《对非市场经济国家使用反补贴税法案》(4105法案),明确了反补贴法既适用于市场经济国家,也适用于非市场经济国家,这在美国反补贴立法史上具有分水岭意义。
The United States is the first country which applied the countervailing measures. Before the set-up of the GATr, the US Anti-Subsidy Law was the representative of this kind. With the development of the muhilat- eral trade system,the US Anti-Subsidy Law itself is making quirement of material injury to the domestic industry, continuous improvement, not only adding the re- modifying the procedures of collecting countervailing du- ties and judicial review, but providing the remedies for domestic producers. It has also authorized the President to negotiate with other countries on the subsidy agreement. However, the US Anti-Subsidy Law has long been silent on its application to those non-market economies, in contrast to that of the Anti-Dumping Law. In March 2012,the US Congress passed Act 4105 which has clarified the those non-market economies. This is regarded as the division line point that the Anti-Subsidy Law applies to in the development of US Anti-Subsidy Law.
出处
《河南财经政法大学学报》
北大核心
2012年第6期68-73,共6页
Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law
基金
上海交通大学文理交叉课题的部分研究成果(项目编号:11JCY01)
