摘要
与社会的进步和发展相伴随的是人们之间的纠纷日益增多,纠纷解决方法日益完善,在纠纷解决中涉及专门性问题的时候必然要求助于具有专门知识的专家,从而产生了鉴定人制度。然而,社会的进步与发展导致了纠纷所涉专业的多样化,科学技术的进步就为纠纷解决困难的专业问题提供新的解决思路和方法,而职业鉴定人专司鉴定工作不再从事原有的专业工作,其对新的知识和经验的掌握日渐落后。鉴定结论的本质在于其科学性,职业鉴定人随着从事鉴定工作时间的增加,越来越远离其先前从事的专业,从而造成了鉴定人的知识理论体系与鉴定所需的科学知识的偏离。另一方面,纠纷所涉及的科学知识领域越来越宽泛,职业鉴定人的知识结构不能全部涵盖,但是法庭求助的机会较少又不足以诱导产生新领域的职业鉴定人,从而造就了一批业余的鉴定人。解决职业鉴定人所面临的困境,一是构建一种职业鉴定人、兼职鉴定人、临时聘请鉴定人相结合的鉴定人制度。二是将职业鉴定主体打造为多元化功能集合体,集科学研究、教学培训、生产加工和法庭服务于一身;三是过渡期加强对现有司法鉴定主体培训。
Accompanied with social progress and development, the disputes between people are increasing and the method of dispute resolution is improved increasingly at the same time. When special issue is involved during the dispute resolution, it is necessary to turn to experts with specialized knowledge. Thus forensic expert system comes into being. However, social progress and development lead to the diversification of the disputed profession, scientific and technological progress also provide new ideas and methods to solve these difficult professional disputes, then forensic experts are no longer solely engaged in the original work. Their knowledge and experience of these new field is lagging behind day by day. The nature of expertise conclusions lies in its scientific, but the working time of forensic experts is increasing. They are getting far away from the previous professions which are engaged previously, resulting in a dilemma: the theoretical knowledge of forensic expert can’t match the scientific knowledge which is needed. On the other hand, as the involved scientific knowledge in disputes are becoming so broad that it is far beyond the capacity of the expert’s knowledge structure, and the need of the court is too small to support new professional forensic experts, then a number of amateur forensic expert appears. In order to solve this problem faced by forensic expert system, the first thing needed is to create a system which combines professional forensic experts, amateur forensic experts and temporary forensic experts; the second is to build a diversified professional forensic expert group which will contain the function of scientific research, teaching, training, production, processing and court serving; the third is to strengthen the training of the existing judicial forensic expert group.
出处
《中国政法大学学报》
2012年第6期78-86,159,共9页
Journal Of CUPL
基金
中国政法大学2008年校级人文社会科学研究项目"司法鉴定服务合同研究"(编号08ZFG82004)
